Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


RC T-Beam flange connected

RC T-Beam flange connected

RC T-Beam flange connected

I have a existing (precast) reinforced concrete beam that was connected to a girder by placing it on a ledge. (There is a formed shear key as well.) Apparently, after the placement, a floor was poured.....that essentially made it a t-beam. The slab is tied to the girder by top & bottom reinforcement.

By my model, some shear is attempting to transfer by shear stress in the slab (as you would expect) to the girder. But the "web"/precast part can take all the shear. So I am wondering: can I ignore the shear from the slab attempting to "help" in the transfer? My gut instinct is: "no". Go with the model. By any shear flow calculation, you'd get some shear.....no doubt. But I wonder if there is a loophole in code somewhere I am forgetting.

In case you are wondering about sizes: the precast beam is 4'x2', and the slab is 1' thick. Thanks.

RE: RC T-Beam flange connected

Quote (WARose)

So I am wondering: can I ignore the shear from the slab attempting to "help" in the transfer?

Hell yes. For no other reason than that everybody does this all the time and we'd go nuts if we were to try to track things down to such a granular level of detail. Yes, you'd probably crack your slab in shear near the beam before fully engaging your beam stirrups under ULS conditions. Risk it.

RE: RC T-Beam flange connected

As always, thanks for the feedback Kootk.

RE: RC T-Beam flange connected

For what its worth, Koot’s approach is no different this side of the pond.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Ebook - Mastering Tolerances for Machined Parts
When making CNC machined parts, mastering tolerances can be challenging. Are general tolerances good enough? When does it make sense to call out for tighter tolerances? Do you need a better understanding of fits, datums, or GD&T? Learn about these topics and more in Xometry's new e-book. Download Now
eBook – How to Choose the Correct Corrosion Testing Method
When designing a metal component, engineers have to consider how susceptible certain alloys are to corrosion in the final product’s operating environment. In a recent study by NACE (National Association of Corrosion Engineers), it was estimated that the direct and indirect costs of corrosion in the United States is approximately 6.2% of the GDP. In 2016, that cost exceeded $1 trillion dollars for the first time. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close