×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

body and neck valve thicknesses
2

body and neck valve thicknesses

body and neck valve thicknesses

(OP)
hello colleagues,

I am used to making thickness calculations according to codes like ASME VIII div 1 for pressure vessels, and now I have the challenge of evaluating if a new valve body design meets the thickness requirements defined by the ASME B16.34 standard.

I am correct in affirming that the methodology for obtaining the minimum thicknesses for valves derives from tables 3A and 3B, but also very related to the calculation by finite elements and accumulated experience of the engineer?

I mean, depending on the geometry and pressurized internal surfaces, the only use of these tables or mandatory appendix VI, for the determination of body thickness can lead to permanent deformations in the hydrostatic test or even rupture of pressurized parts.

Am I right?

any help will be very useful.

RE: body and neck valve thicknesses


Hi Fernandol

I am no expert here, but if I am correct this is minimum thickness we are talking about(?).

In the good old days, when I got my education, the professor wiped out all factors less than one hundred-parts of the strength factor number he had calculated on the blackboard, paused, and added: 'And then we multiply by a safety factor of five!'

Nothing wrong about adding (a sensible) safety factor, not necessarily five!

RE: body and neck valve thicknesses

Hello,

Rules for designing pressure vessels and valve bodies are different. ASME B16.34 has an Appendix that explains the basis for establishing the wall thickness. Because a valve is a mechanical instrument where critical dimensions must remain stable over long periods of time to reliably operate and contain pressure, valve body wall thickness is based on material creep strength. If you perform FEA and use allowable stress as your acceptance criteria, you are not meeting the intent of B16.34.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources

White Paper – Your Construction ERP RFP Checklist
Selecting business software for a medium to enterprise-sized construction concern is extremely challenging in large part because most enterprise resource planning (ERP) suites originated in the world of repetitive manufacturing and are therefore a poor fit for a project and asset-centric business. However, midsize to large contractors need the predictable, auditable processes that ERP delivers. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close