Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Unanchored tank modal analysis

Unanchored tank modal analysis

Unanchored tank modal analysis


Is the modal analysis of unanchored tanks (simply placed on the ground) with abaqus any reliable given the nonlinear nature of the problem? I've obtained some results for convective and impulsive modes but don't know if they are any valid or not.

RE: Unanchored tank modal analysis

It should be possible to obtain valuable results for this case in Abaqus. This software is made for nonlinearities and it can handle fluid-structure interaction (or acoustic-structural coupling actually) too. How did you model the problem ?

There are some papers about it. For example these two:
- "Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Unanchored Steel Liquid Storage Tanks Subjected to Seismic Loadings" by H.N. Phan, F. Paolacii and P. Mongabure
- "Fluid-Structure Interaction Problems: An Application to Anchored and Unanchored Steel Storage Tanks Subjected to Seismic Loadings" by H.N. Phan, F. Paolacii

RE: Unanchored tank modal analysis

we have discussed this and shown that acoustic elements can be used (it can be hard to identify modes, but they work).

So if it is not anchored you can let it sit on top of the ground and have frictional contact between the tank and the ground, and then run it with nonlinear transient dynamics say typically with seismic loads (you cannot use modal since it is a linear analysis and does not account for the complex contact between the two structures).

Now I have never done anything like that (measurements or FEA), so I cannot comment if the modes you calculate (probably free suspended tank), are close to the real modes when the structure rests on the ground - obviously the BC are quite different.

In any way seismic transient nonlinear transient dynamic analysis uses implicit time integration since it needs to account for all nonlinearities (contact, material geometry), and thus a mode superposition is not used, but an implicit scheme, so modes are not used.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


eBook – How to Choose the Correct Corrosion Testing Method
When designing a metal component, engineers have to consider how susceptible certain alloys are to corrosion in the final product’s operating environment. In a recent study by NACE (National Association of Corrosion Engineers), it was estimated that the direct and indirect costs of corrosion in the United States is approximately 6.2% of the GDP. In 2016, that cost exceeded $1 trillion dollars for the first time. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close