×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Factored vs unfactored vs ULS vs SLS

Factored vs unfactored vs ULS vs SLS

Factored vs unfactored vs ULS vs SLS

(OP)
Hello!

I have a question regarding factored vs unfactored loads. Sometimes I come across foundation plans that call out a required screw pile capacity as an unfactored load. In Canada, we can calculate a ULS snow load and SLS snow load – the only difference between the 2 being an importance factor. When it comes to determining an unfactored required pile capacity, would you use the ULS snow load or SLS snow load? As I write this out, I’m thinking it is correct to use the ULS snow load as it is still a strength design check?

RE: Factored vs unfactored vs ULS vs SLS

I've specified the unfactored loads on screw piles as well. I do it as my total load. And that is due to the fact that many of the capacities provided by the screw pile guys are allowable (i.e. tested to failure and then a safety factor is applied).

That being said, whether to use the different importance factors or not, I personally use the ULS importance factors at all times until I'm desperate to make something work out. Because for a normal importance building it means you get to reduce by 10% for your deflection calcs, when in all honesty more often than not the members are strength governed.

RE: Factored vs unfactored vs ULS vs SLS

(OP)
jayrod12 - that makes sense to me. I think I had SLS and unfactored confused, they are not the same thing. I would say a pile load is an ULS design requirement, so the ULS snow load would need to be used. But then you just simply add all load components with no other factors (load combinations) for the unfactored load.

RE: Factored vs unfactored vs ULS vs SLS

The load you should be passing is the specified load. The actual load which the item is intended to be used for.

That would generally mean that it's strength design forces, but factors haven't been applied. That gets a little... fuzzier... when you're talking about earthquakes.




RE: Factored vs unfactored vs ULS vs SLS

The geotechs are still lagging behind in the limit states design world up here. I think it was only recently that the CFEM started addressing ULS and SLS with resistance factors. So, for foundation design, I typically still go back to the allowable/unfactored/service loads. They should still work, theoretically, versus an ultimate limit states design. The advantage is that the unfactored loads are what pile load tests or proprietary/historical designs have been established on.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - PLM and ERP: Their Respective Roles in Modern Manufacturing
Leading manufacturers are aligning their people, processes, and tools from initial product ideation through to field service. They do so by providing access to product and enterprise data in the context of each person’s domain expertise. However, it can be complicated and costly to unite engineering with the factory and supply chain. Download Now
White Paper - Medical Device Design Control
Medical device product development is a highly integrated and regulated process. Implementation of a requirements tracking solution requires attention to a variety of nuanced topics. When presented with the task of tracking the many concept relationships in a project of this type, the initial software solution of choice tends to be a two-dimensional text systems. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close