×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Shop Balancing Machine Questions - Sensitivity Unit Conversion & Determing Achievable Unbalance
2

Shop Balancing Machine Questions - Sensitivity Unit Conversion & Determing Achievable Unbalance

Shop Balancing Machine Questions - Sensitivity Unit Conversion & Determing Achievable Unbalance

(OP)
Hi everyone, I'd appreciate some assistance with the following two questions, I do not have much experience with balancing machines.

I'm attempting to convert a balancing machine sensitivity specification from g-mm/kg to Imperial (USCS) units of oz-in/lb. I've used the following conversion factors but do not seem to obtain a value that is anywhere near the spec provided by a company so I think I must be missing something. (0.0353 oz / 1g)(1 in / 25.4 mm)(1 kg / 2.2 lb) Using those conversion factors for a 0.1 g-mm/kg sensitivity I arrived ~6.3E-5 oz-in/lb vice the company conversion of 0.04 oz-in/lb. I've attached an excerpt from their specs.

[1] Is my approach of just multiplying the conversion factors incorrect? If so, could someone please communicate what I may be missing?

The next item of possible confusion pertains to that sensitivity specification, more specifically its application and relationship to eccentricity, and minimum achievable residual imbalance. These three terms all seem to have the same units and I've read them on different company product specs so I suspect they are similar.
[2] Once the sensitivity is successfully converted, it seems that I could use that value to determine the achievable unbalance (assuming ideal or defined conditions) by simply multiplying by rotor weight with correct units, would that approach be correct?

Thank you so much for any assistance with the above two items.

RE: Shop Balancing Machine Questions - Sensitivity Unit Conversion & Determing Achievable Unbalance

(OP)
@GregLocock, I'm not sure, it's possible they made a mistake, I just thought it more likely that I did.

In the 2nd question I mentioned rotor weight because we primarily deal with rotor and impeller balancing, but I suppose I should have written rotational part or assembly weight.

RE: Shop Balancing Machine Questions - Sensitivity Unit Conversion & Determing Achievable Unbalance

I get the same result as OP and Greg.
I used smath as a scratchpad to show the calulation:
https://en.smath.com/cloud/worksheet/MEMTS5qo

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?

RE: Shop Balancing Machine Questions - Sensitivity Unit Conversion & Determing Achievable Unbalance

Quote:

[2] Once the sensitivity is successfully converted, it seems that I could use that value to determine the achievable unbalance (assuming ideal or defined conditions) by simply multiplying by rotor weight with correct units, would that approach be correct?

I agree. Unless there is some other definition given for "sensitivity", I can't think of any meaning for sensitivity other than that it is equivalent to eccentricity e, (with a different choice of units)

Eccentricity e can be converted to unbalance m*r by multiplying by rotating part mass M
(m * r) = e * M


=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?

RE: Shop Balancing Machine Questions - Sensitivity Unit Conversion & Determing Achievable Unbalance

(OP)
@electricpete thank you for taking the time to work through the two questions and provide confirmation. I've bookmarked that smath tool, that is the first time i've seen it, pretty nice.

@GregLocock thank you for the confirmation as well.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources

eBook - Efficient and Effective Production Support with 3D Printed Jigs and Fixtures
Jigs and fixtures offer manufacturers a reliable process for delivering accurate, high-quality outcomes, whether for a specific part or feature, or for consistency across multiples of parts. Although the methodologies and materials for producing jigs and fixtures have evolved beyond the conventional metal tooling of years past, their position as a manufacturing staple remains constant due to the benefits they offer. Download Now
Overcoming Cutting Tool Challenges in Aerospace Machining
Aerospace manufacturing has always been on the cutting edge, from materials to production techniques. However, these two aspects of aerospace machining can conflict, as manufacturers strive to maintain machining efficiency with new materials by using new methods and cutting tools. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close