Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


NEC Classification vs. Mil-SPec

NEC Classification vs. Mil-SPec

NEC Classification vs. Mil-SPec

Our measurement group (natural gas pipeline) is looking at purchasing a videoscope (borescope) for use in inspecting the internals of various parts of their equipment.

Their candidate is shown to be "MIL-STD-810G, METHOD 511.6, Procedure I (operation in an explosive atmosphere test)".

I'm the area (five states) electrical guy and I'm accustomed to evaluating equipment in terms of area classification in terms of NEC. My general feeling is that the equipment meeting military standard will also be suitable for our situation where metering equipment may retain varying amounts of natural gas when opened for inspection.

Has anybody got any insight into this issue? My corporate safety and engineering departments haven't been much help.

old field guy

RE: NEC Classification vs. Mil-SPec

Well here's the applicable standard https://www.uvsr.org/Documentatie%20UVS/Reglementa...

and here's one manufacturer's opinion of testing v's certification https://www.intercompaviation.com/uploads/document...

By chance it isn't one of these boroscopes? They seem to have been tested to the MIL standard and certified by UL. https://www.fiberscope.net/explosion-proof-boresco... Disclaimer - I work under the European ATEX directives, so I have an interest in the North American standards but I'm not an expert on them.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


eBook - Mastering Tolerances for Machined Parts
When making CNC machined parts, mastering tolerances can be challenging. Are general tolerances good enough? When does it make sense to call out for tighter tolerances? Do you need a better understanding of fits, datums, or GD&T? Learn about these topics and more in Xometry's new e-book. Download Now
eBook – How to Choose the Correct Corrosion Testing Method
When designing a metal component, engineers have to consider how susceptible certain alloys are to corrosion in the final product’s operating environment. In a recent study by NACE (National Association of Corrosion Engineers), it was estimated that the direct and indirect costs of corrosion in the United States is approximately 6.2% of the GDP. In 2016, that cost exceeded $1 trillion dollars for the first time. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close