Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


2D elements "shear force"

2D elements "shear force"

2D elements "shear force"

Is there a way to add a force along 2D plate elements in FEMAP on a single curve. I have projected a line on a surface and added a force to the curve that is in the same plane as the surface, but the model does not recognize the force and shows zero stress after running the analysis. What is the correct way to apply a concentrated load along a surface?

RE: 2D elements "shear force"

does "projected a line on a surface" mean that you've split the surface ?

which curve did you apply the load to ...
1) the "projected" curve ? or
2) the edge curves created in splitting the surface ? (the edge curves associated with the surface)

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: 2D elements "shear force"

I used Geometry>Curve from Surface>Project and then applied the load to the projected curve.

RE: 2D elements "shear force"

yes, but is that curve an edge of the surface ? I don't think you can load a "random" curve.

How is that curve meshed ??

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: 2D elements "shear force"


the surface is split at the curve now, so I guess it is the edge of surface.

My understanding was that FEMAP converted the force on the curve to nodal forces to nodes touching the curve. What extra steps should be taken to add a force to a curve?

RE: 2D elements "shear force"

not so fast.

is the curve associated with the two surfaces ? (look at the properties of the surfaces (edge curves)

is the curve meshed ?

I think you'll find the surfaces have a different curve underneath your initial curve (one of the annoying things FeMap does ... co-incident curves).

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: 2D elements "shear force"

I've meshed the curve with "plot only elements". How do I check if the curve is associated with the two surfaces?

RE: 2D elements "shear force"

looking at the properties of the surfaces should list their edge curves.

use of "plot only" elements should explain why you're not having any joy in FEA.

I'd ...

1) split the surface into two,

2) mesh both surfaces at the same time. This "should" prevent duplicate nodes along the split. If you want to be particular about your mesh, mesh the edge curves, then create elements on the surfaces.

3) apply your load to one of the curves.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: 2D elements "shear force"

Embarrassingly I do not know how to check the properties of a surface

RE: 2D elements "shear force"

humm, doesn't seem as simple as I thought. When you split the surface along your curve the surfaces will create new edge curves, which will be meshed with the surface (but your original curve won't). then use one of these to describe your load. you may need to experiment with picking which curve !? if you mesh both surfaces together then you won't get coincident nodes along to common edge. If you mesh the surfaces on their own you will which you can fix using tools/check/coincident nodes ... so long as you have the same meshing along the common side. Then the resulting nodes may depend on which curve set you retained (though I'd hope it would overwrite the replaced set ... maybe, maybe not !?).

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: 2D elements "shear force"

If you apply loads on geometric entities you have to have FEM entities associated with the geometry and expand the loads before analyzing. A load on a curve will not be included when running the solver.


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


eBook - Mastering Tolerances for Machined Parts
When making CNC machined parts, mastering tolerances can be challenging. Are general tolerances good enough? When does it make sense to call out for tighter tolerances? Do you need a better understanding of fits, datums, or GD&T? Learn about these topics and more in Xometry's new e-book. Download Now
eBook – How to Choose the Correct Corrosion Testing Method
When designing a metal component, engineers have to consider how susceptible certain alloys are to corrosion in the final product’s operating environment. In a recent study by NACE (National Association of Corrosion Engineers), it was estimated that the direct and indirect costs of corrosion in the United States is approximately 6.2% of the GDP. In 2016, that cost exceeded $1 trillion dollars for the first time. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close