×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Consider Upper Columns in Slab Design

Consider Upper Columns in Slab Design

Consider Upper Columns in Slab Design

(OP)
I saw some older discussion in thread803-403840: COLUMN TOP RESTRAIN - CsI SAFE of modeling the columns above, for slab design. I'm interested to hear other opinions about this for two-way flat plate design: My understanding has been that since the forms are released to allow the slab to carry its self-weight before the next floor is completed, the slab will carry that self-weight load (which may be around 75% of the total load in some cases) while only the columns below are in place. Only after the floor above is completed, then the columns above will contribute their stiffness in resisting the live load. It seems that you either need to assume the columns above are there for all the load (which overestimates the column stiffness for the self-weight, which is a majority of the total load), or design for all load with only the columns below (which underestimates the column stiffness for the live load).
If anyone can provide some insight for the justification of one assumption or the other, I would appreciate your thoughts.

RE: Consider Upper Columns in Slab Design

Traditional flat plate slab design (check any book) for example equivalent frame method , or ACI 318 Handbook. Always, accounts for columns above and below, the rotational stiffness of the node is different, which can affect punching shear checks. This makes sense, since usually form work are striped after in some case 2 or 3 floors above are poured so effectively the column above will be there once the forms of that floor are removed.

Enrique

www.structuralapps.com
www.Tilmanllc.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - Rethink Your PLM
A lot has changed since the 90s. You don't surf the Web using dial-up anymore, so why are you still using a legacy PLM solution that's blocking your ability to innovate? To develop and launch products today, you need a flexible, cloud-based PLM, not a solution that's stuck in the past. Download Now
White Paper - Using Virtualization for IVI and AUTOSAR Consolidation on an ECU
Current approaches used to tackle the complexities of a vehicle’s electrical and electronics (E/E) architecture are both cost prohibitive and lacking in performance. Utilizing virtualization in automotive software architecture provides a better approach. This can be achieved by encapsulating different heterogeneous automotive platforms inside virtual machines running on the same hardware. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close