I saw some older discussion in thread803-403840: COLUMN TOP RESTRAIN - CsI SAFE of modeling the columns above, for slab design. I'm interested to hear other opinions about this for two-way flat plate design: My understanding has been that since the forms are released to allow the slab to carry its self-weight before the next floor is completed, the slab will carry that self-weight load (which may be around 75% of the total load in some cases) while only the columns below are in place. Only after the floor above is completed, then the columns above will contribute their stiffness in resisting the live load. It seems that you either need to assume the columns above are there for all the load (which overestimates the column stiffness for the self-weight, which is a majority of the total load), or design for all load with only the columns below (which underestimates the column stiffness for the live load).
If anyone can provide some insight for the justification of one assumption or the other, I would appreciate your thoughts.
Red Flag Submitted
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.
Reply To This Thread
Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.
Many manufacturers rely on a product data management (PDM) system that once met their basic data management needs. As they expand their business and develop more complex products, they find their system falls short. Download the guide to find out how to meet your needs with PLM. Download Now
Beating out competitors, PTC has taken the number one spot to earn the Product Leadership Award 2019 from Frost & Sullivan. This award is given to North American PLM solution providers for excellence in digital transformation particularly with discrete manufacturing. Download Now
A lot has changed since the 90s. You don't surf the Web using dial-up anymore, so why are you still using a legacy PLM solution that's blocking your ability to innovate? To develop and launch products today, you need a flexible, cloud-based PLM, not a solution that's stuck in the past. Download Now
Current approaches used to tackle the complexities of a vehicleâ€™s electrical and electronics (E/E) architecture are both cost prohibitive and lacking in performance. Utilizing virtualization in automotive software architecture provides a better approach. This can be achieved by encapsulating different heterogeneous automotive platforms inside virtual machines running on the same hardware. Download Now