×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Derivation of table 10-8 - AISC Manual
2

Derivation of table 10-8 - AISC Manual

Derivation of table 10-8 - AISC Manual

(OP)
How are the values for Table 10-8 of AISC Manual derived? I have read the commentary before the Table that it used the elastic method to calculate those values. I have tried solving (posted below) but can't seem to get the values written on the Table. To be fair, I am not sure with the eccentricity to be used. Where did I go wrong?



Solution below is for L = 6 in, W = 4, weld size =1. ASD --

RE: Derivation of table 10-8 - AISC Manual

Are you taking advantage of the fillet weld strength increase when loaded perp. to the weld longitudinal axis?

Ian Riley, PE, SE
Professional Engineer (ME, NH, VT, CT, MA, FL) Structural Engineer (IL, HI)
American Concrete Industries https://americanconcrete.com/

RE: Derivation of table 10-8 - AISC Manual

Looks like you're not taking the horizontal portion of the seat weld (0.4L, shown in figure 10-10) into account with your calculations, which the tables do account for.

Also the force P is assumed to act at 0.8W for the computation of the moment on the weld group, so the moment would be 0.8W * P.

RE: Derivation of table 10-8 - AISC Manual

The basis for the tabulated loads in AISC 360-10 Table 10-8, as limited by weld strength, is derived in "Design of Welded Structures" by Blodgett in Section 5.3. The derivation can also be found in "Steel Structures - Design and Behavior" by Salmon and Johnson in Chapter 13 (fifth edition). The derivations assume two (2), L-shaped welds attaching the stiffened seat to the supporting structure. An increase in weld strength due to direction of load relative to the weld axis has not been taken into account. Note you must check the supported beam for web local yielding and web local crippling.

RE: Derivation of table 10-8 - AISC Manual

(OP)
Thank you! I finally figured out the Table with the help of your comments. It turns out, I have been wrong on quite a number of things.

1. Eccentricity is indeed at 0.8W, just like @sbisteel has said, which is also stated in the AISC Manual.
2. Horizontal welds with total length of 0.4L were not considered.
3. The part to be considered for the bending stress is the topmost part and not at the bottom.

Is there a reason why the eccentricity used is 0.8W? Also, why is the topmost part considered and not the bottommost (which has a higher stress than the top)?

RE: Derivation of table 10-8 - AISC Manual

The bottom portion of the stiffened seat is in compression, bearing against the column.

I believe the idea behind the 0.8W eccentricity is that as a simply supported beam deflects, the end closest to the column will want to lift off of the seat, pushing the bearing stresses out towards the end of the connection.

RE: Derivation of table 10-8 - AISC Manual

I agree with sbisteel's comments. In response to your last question, it is my understanding that laboratory testing has confirmed the validity, and reasonable conservatism, of the current approach with regard to weld strength. For a bit more insight and discussion of the conservatism of the current approach, you might be interested in an article ("Economy in Stiffened Steel Seated Beam Connections") by Skourup and Zottola in the September 2008 issue of STRUCTURE magazine (www.STRUCTUREmag.org).

RE: Derivation of table 10-8 - AISC Manual

(OP)
Got it. Thank you!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources

eBook - Mastering Tolerances for Machined Parts
When making CNC machined parts, mastering tolerances can be challenging. Are general tolerances good enough? When does it make sense to call out for tighter tolerances? Do you need a better understanding of fits, datums, or GD&T? Learn about these topics and more in Xometry's new e-book. Download Now
eBook – How to Choose the Correct Corrosion Testing Method
When designing a metal component, engineers have to consider how susceptible certain alloys are to corrosion in the final product’s operating environment. In a recent study by NACE (National Association of Corrosion Engineers), it was estimated that the direct and indirect costs of corrosion in the United States is approximately 6.2% of the GDP. In 2016, that cost exceeded $1 trillion dollars for the first time. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close