×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
• Talk With Other Members
• Be Notified Of Responses
• Keyword Search
Favorite Forums
• Automated Signatures
• Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

#### Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

# DATUM TARGETS

## DATUM TARGETS

(OP)
ASME Y14.5-2009
4.24.12 Secondary Datum Axis

For MMB, the centering method used to establish the datum axis has a set of three equally spaced features set at a fixed radial distance based on the MMB.

Regarding fig 4-53:

Question: Should I understand that if B had been callout at MMB in the positional callout (and maybe in the profile callout) then a perpendicularity on Ø.170 ± 0.1 outside diameter to datum feature A is needed?

Otherwise how to calculate the MMB requested on the above paragraph, if the orientation relationship between B and A is missing?

But, on the other hand, as far as I can see, in general when datum targets are used no such a relationship (between primary and / or secondary/ tertiary) is needed.

Therefore, no perpendicularity needed if B is RMB and perpendicularity is required if B is MMB? Is my understanding correct?

### RE: DATUM TARGETS

aniiben,
This isn't really a question about datum targets. Regardless if datum feature B is referenced RMB or MMB and regardless if secondary datum axis is derived from datum targets or from the entire feature, it shall have a perpendicularity control relative to A, othwerwise the feature won't be fully defined.

Besides, if you take a look at the RMB definition (1.3.49) it says that: "regardless of material boundary (RMB) indicates that a datum feature simulator progresses from MMB toward LMB...". This means that even in RMB case there has to be a MMB from which the progression of datum feature simulator should start.

### RE: DATUM TARGETS

I see no examples in the standard where if a datum target is used the relationship with the higher precedence datums is shown. Did I miss the applicable pictures or figures? I know that Y14.8 has in the non mandatory appendix B an example B-1 where perpendicularity to datum A target is shown. Why not in the main document?

P.S. I also have seen “almost” the same question (conceptually) posted on linkedin on AGI Group.
Must be something in the air (water) around those datum targets

#### Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

#### Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

#### Resources

Solutions Brief - Protecting and Rescuing On-Ground Personnel
Keeping our warfighters safe and delivering them a competitive advantage is a key goal of departments of defense around the world. Itâ€™s a goal shared by embedded computing manufacturers like Abaco: we never forget who we serve.This case study describes how a major international contractor integrated an Abaco single board computer at the heart of its CAS/CSAR solution. Download Now
Datasheet - Top Enhancements Creo 7.0
PTC's Creo 7.0 has breakthrough innovations in the areas of generative design, real-time simulation, multibody design, additive manufacturing, and more! With Creo 7.0, you will be able to design the most innovative products faster than ever before, keeping you on the cutting edge of product design and ahead of your competition. Download Now

Close Box

# Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

• Talk To Other Members
• Notification Of Responses To Questions
• Favorite Forums One Click Access
• Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More...

Register now while it's still free!