×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Graphical symbol for Normally Open Held Closed limit switch

Graphical symbol for Normally Open Held Closed limit switch

Graphical symbol for Normally Open Held Closed limit switch

(OP)
I'm currently trying to hold my ground over the symbolic representation of a Normally Closed Held Open switch with an engineer. He pretends my representation is not per ISA 5.1. As far as I can see from the internet, I do not see a representation of such a switch at all according to this standard... unless I'm missing something.

I found lots of examples suggesting I'm right with the way I represent it, but he keeps on refuting that.

So I'm asking here if somebody would be kind enough to share with me the correct way of representing a NCHO switch, and per which set of standard.

Note: the engineer is a consulting engineer, in a different location, and won't share with me his standard document, he is only refering to "ISA 5.1".

Thanks.

RE: Graphical symbol for Normally Open Held Closed limit switch

Here is a partial page from ISA 5.1 2009 with electrical symbols. It does not illustrate the held closed/open versions.
Items 10 through 15 are actuation symbols: rotary (manual), pressure, Differential pressure, liquid level, temperature, flow.



And here is a 'motor controls' graphic showing the same symbols and the corresponding held open/closed versions:


RE: Graphical symbol for Normally Open Held Closed limit switch

(OP)
Thank you Danw2.
I had already seen this and provided similar links to that engineer, to no avail. The way the NCHO is represented is how I did it, but that person wants it as a NC contact, the way they are asking, but they call it NCHO. Go figure... In RED in the attached, you can sse his comments.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources

eBook - Mastering Tolerances for Machined Parts
When making CNC machined parts, mastering tolerances can be challenging. Are general tolerances good enough? When does it make sense to call out for tighter tolerances? Do you need a better understanding of fits, datums, or GD&T? Learn about these topics and more in Xometry's new e-book. Download Now
eBook – How to Choose the Correct Corrosion Testing Method
When designing a metal component, engineers have to consider how susceptible certain alloys are to corrosion in the final product’s operating environment. In a recent study by NACE (National Association of Corrosion Engineers), it was estimated that the direct and indirect costs of corrosion in the United States is approximately 6.2% of the GDP. In 2016, that cost exceeded $1 trillion dollars for the first time. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close