Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Confused about Confidence

Confused about Confidence

Confused about Confidence

I was presented with a problem that I am not sure how to go about solving. If a product is to be used 600 times in a year, what would be the amount of tests I need to do without fail that would suggest with 90% confidence that this product would not fail in that year? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

RE: Confused about Confidence

You are talking about a product with failure rate (failure on demand) less than 1/600 = less than 0.001667 or < 1.67 E-03
This is equivalent to SIL (Safety Integrity Level) of 2, which is quite common for many industrial devices.

Depending on the product configuration (redundancy, voting system) and hardware fault tolerance you will come up with the required frequency of full proof tests to maintain the required SIL level.

For more information refer to IEC 61508 and IEC 61511. See also https://www.exida.com/articles/White-Paper-Key-Var...

Process Engineer, MSChE

RE: Confused about Confidence

I'm not following how you're able to test for future non-failure, unless there's some mechanical indication that is a prelude to actual failure. Moreover, if you are that concerned about failure, testing the system consumes life, so you need to factor in whether you are forcing the system into earlier failure.

Do you know what the MTBF is supposed to be? Usually, the innate failure rate can be used in the probability integral to predict with some level of confidence what the probability of failure is within a certain period of time, but it's a very coarse estimate. Nevertheless, unless you are talking about wearout or fatigue, classical failures are RANDOM, and are not predictable.

TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvg
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers Entire Forum list http://www.eng-tips.com/forumlist.cfm

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper - The Criticality of the E/E Architecture
Modern vehicles are highly sophisticated systems incorporating electrical, electronic, software and mechanical components. Mechanical systems are giving way to advanced software and electronic devices, driving automakers to innovate and differentiate their vehicles via the electric and electronic (E/E) architecture. As the pace of change accelerates, automotive companies need to evolve their development processes to deliver and maximize the value of these architectures. Download Now
White Paper - Model Based Engineering for Wire Harness Manufacturing
Modern cars, trucks, and other vehicles feature an ever-increasing number of sophisticated electrical and electronic features, placing a larger burden on the wiring harness that enables these new features. As complexity rises, current harness manufacturing methods are struggling to keep pace due to manual data exchanges and the inability to capture tribal knowledge. A model-based wire harness manufacturing engineering flow automates data exchange and captures tribal knowledge through design rules to help harness manufacturers improve harness quality and boost efficiency. Download Now
White Paper - Modeling and Optimizing Wire Harness Costs for Variation Complexity
This paper will focus on the quantification of the complexity related costs in harness variations in order to model them, allowing automated algorithms to optimize for these costs. A number of real world examples will be provided as well. Since no two businesses are alike, it is the aim of this paper to provide the foundational knowledge and methodology so the reader can assess their own business to model how variation complexity costs affect their business. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close