×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

SIL certification for an Self-Contained Hydraulic ESD valve

SIL certification for an Self-Contained Hydraulic ESD valve

SIL certification for an Self-Contained Hydraulic ESD valve

(OP)
Hi there,
I got these days an Self-Contained Hydraulic actuator with own hydraulic system and options to be actuated or itself, or via a electrical actuation on the existing option for the solenoid. First, I did assessed the electrical actuation option - the solenoid been powered just triggers the hydraulic system and that depressurizing release the spring and the actuator get closed. So far, so good. The solenoid was SIL certified, the ball valve the same. At the end I got a full SIF considering the PT in upstream and a control relay - all SIL rated.
Now, I have the same assembly installed in a remote location where there is no power, and the ESDV came as pilot activated upon the pipeline pressure and triggers as above the system. Well - no electricity, but the same valve and the pilots are SIL certified, because they also have an option for the NO/NC contact on if comes to H or L pressure. At this time the my SIF is just limited with the the final element itself and been rated accordingly - using the PFDs of the ball valves and the pilots. Meet the RRF target, all done. Question came - why I did such since the assembly has no E (electricity). My clarification was that there is the way to be implemented via those NO/NC contacts on pilots, so it complies with EN61508 "The risk is reduced to a tolerable level by applying safety functions which may consist of E/E/PES, associated mechanical devices, or other technologies."
And that was the right interpretation, isn't it?
Thanks
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close