×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Roof live load - would you design for it?

Roof live load - would you design for it?

Roof live load - would you design for it?

(OP)
Good Day,

I'm working on a project where OWSJ reinforcement is required to accommodate new rooftop unit. Building was originally built in 1978 in Canada. OWSJ erection drawings say that it was designed to 14 psf dead load and 36 psf snow (snow load matches current roof snow load). National Building Code Part 4 requires 20 psf minimum live load to be used for roof. Would you consider it? It makes significant difference in the extent of chords to be reinforced when compared to analysis without the LL. I'm thinking of considering it, since local authorities can be very particular and impossible to reason with. Thanks

RE: Roof live load - would you design for it?

Yes. Snow is not the only loading the roof will see over the dead load

RE: Roof live load - would you design for it?

I agree with Ron. I can’t believe that the Canadian codes require load combinations that include BOTH roof live and snow loads at the same time.

Check out Eng-Tips Forum's Policies here:
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Roof live load - would you design for it?

I've never done it. I need to double check the code, which I don't have with me, but I'm fairly certain theres a clause indicating the 1 kPa is only when the snow loads don't exceed that number

RE: Roof live load - would you design for it?

(OP)
I got thrown off by the the comment in appendix a for table 4.1.5.3 saying: "Minimum Roof Live Load:
Articles 4.1.5.3. and 4.1.5.10. stipulate a minimum uniform roof live load of 1.0 kPa and a minimum
concentrated live load of 1.3 kN."

But then clause 4.1.5.5 has this: "Except as provided in Sentences (3) and (4), roofs shall be designed for either the uniform live loads specified in Table 4.1.5.3., the concentrated live loads listed in
Table 4.1.5.9., or the snow and rain loads prescribed in Subsection 4.1.6., whichever
produces the most critical effects in the members concerned."

In my case snow and rain combination produce most critical effects so I don't need to consider LL of 20 psf. Topic is closed. Thank you.

RE: Roof live load - would you design for it?

If you have to apply the live with the snow, let the code writer personally apply his load on a 4:12 or higher pitched snowy and icy roof.

Never done it and never will. One or the other, not both.


Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)


RE: Roof live load - would you design for it?

Serhiy2:
I think that the code’s real intention is: that while there is a snow load on the roof they will probably not be holding dance parties on the roof deck area or doing significant maintenance operations on the roof, and the like, thus the 20lbs./sq.ft. (1 kPa) LL may not be applicable in addition to the snow load; but the “concentrated live load of 1.3 kN” (300lb.) a worker with tools, fixing a mechanical unit certainly might occur during a snow loading. Thus, Ron’s post seems quite appropriate. The roof system should be designed to support all the loads which might reasonably be applied to it.

RE: Roof live load - would you design for it?

The code intent is to apply a minimum live load of 1 kPa. If the snow load or snow plus rain exceeds that, as it does almost everywhere in Canada, then snow governs. For those in Lotus Land, you still have to allow something even if your snow all comes in liquid form.

RE: Roof live load - would you design for it?

Make sure you are reading the load combinations in the code correctly regarding LIVE LOAD and ROOF LIVE LOAD.

LIVE LOAD is meant to be applied to floors. You could have live load on the floors of a multistory building and snow on the roof.

36 psf is roughly 2.5' of snow. You may have 1 or 2 people on the roof in 2.5' of snow for whatever reason, but you will never have 20 psf of people up there in 2.5' of snow.

RE: Roof live load - would you design for it?

@OldBldgGuy,

Coastal BC actually has the highest snow loads in the country I believe - due to the fact its high density slush.

RE: Roof live load - would you design for it?

for owsj the live load is applied to the bottom chord to account for walkways for maintenance. if it meets requirements for clear space ( lt and width).

p

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources

eBook - Mastering Tolerances for Machined Parts
When making CNC machined parts, mastering tolerances can be challenging. Are general tolerances good enough? When does it make sense to call out for tighter tolerances? Do you need a better understanding of fits, datums, or GD&T? Learn about these topics and more in Xometry's new e-book. Download Now
eBook – How to Choose the Correct Corrosion Testing Method
When designing a metal component, engineers have to consider how susceptible certain alloys are to corrosion in the final product’s operating environment. In a recent study by NACE (National Association of Corrosion Engineers), it was estimated that the direct and indirect costs of corrosion in the United States is approximately 6.2% of the GDP. In 2016, that cost exceeded $1 trillion dollars for the first time. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close