×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

understanding mass participation

understanding mass participation

understanding mass participation

(OP)
hi,
I am trying to understand basics of mass participation factor.
My questions are:
1-could someone help me figure out why sum of effective mass of all modes equals the total mass of the system.
2-the higher the mass participation factor the more the mode contribute in total response.why?

RE: understanding mass participation

Quote (OP)

1-could someone help me figure out why sum of effective mass of all modes equals the total mass of the system.

Because, when all is said and done, the entire mass of the system must be accounted for in order for the technique to be valid. It wouldn't make any sense for a portion of the system mass to simply not participate in the vibratory response, right? We designed the technique to have this aspect of conservation built into it.

Quote (OP)

2-the higher the mass participation factor the more the mode contribute in total response.why?

It's kind of a chicken and egg thing. We devised the technique specifically so that we would know how much each mode of vibration contributes to total response. And, low and behold, the technique does allow us to know how much each mode of vibration contributes to total response.

Your questions are a bit irrational in the sense that you're effectively asking:

Why does this mathematical technique designed to do [A & B] do [A & B]? The technique does [A & B] because we formulated it to do [A & B]. When you think of it that way, it's self evident. It's a bit like why asking why 2 + 3 = 5 or why 3 > 2. Those things are true because we formulated or system of mathematics such that they would be.

I don't mean for any of this to be condescending. I simply think that you need to see things in this light in order to recognize that these techniques are man made formulations designed to produce exactly the results that you're questioning.

RE: understanding mass participation

(OP)
I only know the formula of mass participation factor.but how defining it in this way makes it sum up to total mass I could not prove it and this is the problem.and same for my second question.I mean modal participation factor is visible in the differential equations but mass participation factor is not.so it makes sense that the higher the modal participation factor is,the larger the amplitude of the mode.but for mass participation i couldnt prove it.

RE: understanding mass participation

Maybe you are not considering all the modes possible for your structure. You have likely made an error, and you have not given any information regarding what you have done except 'it doesn't work'. Try a simple structure with 2-3 modes to minimise the chance of errors and see if it works.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - Considerations for choosing a 3D printing technology
The adoption of 3D printing into major companies’ product development life cycles is a testament to the technology’s incredible benefits to consumers, designers, engineers and manufacturers. While traditional production methods have limitations in manufacturability, 3D printing provides unparalleled design freedom due to the additive method of building parts layer by layer. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close