Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Vacuum level for annealing 8620

Vacuum level for annealing 8620

Vacuum level for annealing 8620

We have a magnetic component that is blanked from AISI 8620 which we vacuum anneal for magnetic properties prior to gaseous nitrocarburizing to give it a hard case. This whole process was developed initially for similar parts made from 2.5% silicon iron which has worked well for 30+ years. However, I designed a new application that is more sever and the silicon iron proved to be too brittle, pure electrical iron was no better. So I changed the steel to 8620 for the new application and it has passed all our testing and been in volume production for a couple of years with no failures. I made no changes to the anneal and heat treatment specifications which we do in-house. I should note that staff metallurgists who wrote the specs have long since retired and the company has not seen fit to hire any replacements.

Recently we have increased production and the plant manager has asked purchasing and manufacturing to get outside heat treatment sources approved. The outside anneal supplier did not follow our spec which calls for 1 micron of mercury vacuum during the heating and soaking periods of the cycle. Instead, they used 100 microns of mercury vacuum. I can see no change in properties or performance from this but would appreciate someone with a bit of formal training in this area to opine before I approve it.


The Help for this program was created in Windows Help format, which depends on a feature that isn't included in this version of Windows.

RE: Vacuum level for annealing 8620

Why in vacuum at all?
Since the magnetic properties aren't critical (if 8620 is just as good as the other materials) have you thought about testing parts with no anneal? Or maybe a simple neutral atmosphere anneal?
The only issue that I can see is the surface before your N-C treatment. If they respond fine then you are OK.
Though I am a little suspicious, 100um is a crappy vacuum, I would have expected 10um maybe.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, Plymouth Tube

RE: Vacuum level for annealing 8620

In terms of magnetic properties, I expect very little/practically none difference using 1 vs 100 micron vacuum (others equal) for this alloy.

RE: Vacuum level for annealing 8620

Thanks for the replies. I did not see any performance effects from this vacuum discrepancy. Now I have to decide either to change the spec (and justify that to our end customer who is a royal PITA) or reject the parts and find a different supplier.

I would not say 8620 is as good magnetically as the electrical steel or silicon iron but it's good enough (for the new application) and the main thing is it is much tougher. We could break the silicon iron parts in about 100 million cycles, the 8620 goes over one billion, never seen one crack.


The Help for this program was created in Windows Help format, which depends on a feature that isn't included in this version of Windows.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper – Data Security and Know-How Protection
Our data is constantly exposed to the danger of being intercepted or stolen as it wends its way over global data networks. Data security measures and measures for protecting intellectual property should not, however, first be implemented when data is exchanged – companies must lay the foundation for these measures within their own organization. Download Now
White Paper – Collaboration in the PLM Context
The influence exerted by the Internet of Things (IoT) means that there is a steadily growing need for collaboration in industry. Partners from new industries and areas of application need to be integrated in cross-company business processes to ensure that the lifecycle of smart, connected products can be managed from end to end. Download Now
White Paper – The Challenges of PLM Collaboration
There is cross-company collaboration - and then there is cross-company collaboration. Large-scale corporations and joint ventures need different mechanisms to protect intellectual property from those required for communication between different company locations with heterogeneous IT landscapes. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close