×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Settlement of Large Mats / Rafts

Settlement of Large Mats / Rafts

Settlement of Large Mats / Rafts

(OP)
Hi all,

Settlement related query again...

Interested to hear peoples thoughts on settlement calculations for large rafts/mats/slabs on granular soil. The company where i work now considers a foundation a raft where b x l is greater than 5 x 5m. Elastic theory is then applied using the constrained modulus (which is roughly 1.3 - 1.5 times Youngs Modulus (E')). The idea is that the constrained modulus is more appropriate as the soil is constrained due to the size of the foundation and applied load. I dont really have any issues with this approach however they only use elastic theory and ignore other methods such as Schmertmann, Burland and Burbridge, Christian and Carrier etc.

This is where I do not fully agree, I think these methods are still valid. For example Burland and Burbridges method is base on assessment of 200 case studies. I understand that a lot of these slabs were greater than 5 x 5m. Hence i argued that that is proof that this method is valid.

RE: Settlement of Large Mats / Rafts

I'm not a geotech. expert, but you should be able to calculate the soil subgrade modulus based on the size of the mat, then calculate
the settlement accordingly.

RE: Settlement of Large Mats / Rafts

Perhaps you can calculate settlements using different methods and show the results to your company. I think that all methods may be based on the theory of elasticity. Personally, I would use the elastic theory, Schmertmann and Bowles. It will depend also on the size of the mat and the thickness of the sand layer.

RE: Settlement of Large Mats / Rafts

estimation of settlement can be tricky and most of the times measured settlement can be different from the estimated value. I would suggest calculating with different methods and compare them. I personally used elastic theory using E in many projects with no issues.
I hope that will help.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - Considerations for choosing a 3D printing technology
The adoption of 3D printing into major companies’ product development life cycles is a testament to the technology’s incredible benefits to consumers, designers, engineers and manufacturers. While traditional production methods have limitations in manufacturability, 3D printing provides unparalleled design freedom due to the additive method of building parts layer by layer. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close