I recently left a flexible solar module company, and am now working for a lithium battery company. Both company's products are similar in the fact that they are thin and flexible. The flexible solar modules were a laminated structure of thin flexible layers, flexible PV cells, and interconnect ribbons. These product drawings were all done in 2D CAD. I considered redoing these drawings, modeling the laminated product in Solidworks and generating drawings from the model, but in all actuality creating 3D models of these thin, laminated parts, never really worked out well, and is impossible to create an accurate representation. I'm now experiencing similar issues creating drawings and models of these batteries. They are a stack of very thin flexible layers, that are sealed in bags. These are also very hard to represent accurately in Solidworks. And trying to do so creates a overly complicated model, for what it is. Anyways, I'm back to wondering if there is a time and place for 2D CAD. Note, I still use 2D CAD for facility layouts, schematics, and a few other things. I'd like some feedback and am wondering if there are other designers, that have come to similar conclusions.
Red Flag Submitted
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.
Reply To This Thread
Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.
This brief provides a high level summary of advancements in Mentorâ€™s AMS Verification solutions since we saw you all last year at DAC 2019 in Las Vegas. Products featured: Analog FastSPICE Platform, Symphony Mixed-Signal Platform, Solido Variation Designer, and Solido Characterization Suite. Download Now
This resource will help you find key sessions-panels at DAC from researchers, customers, and our expert technologists; and various resources detailing the recent innovations in HLS, Verification, and RTL Low-Power since DAC 2019. Download Now
Among the challenges in the design flow has been aligning the metrics for design-for-test and for functional safety. This paper describes using logic built-in-self-test as both a functional safety mechanism and as a part of in-system testing, which allows for alignment of metrics required for safety certifications. Download Now
IoT systems are multi-domain designs that often require AMS, Digital, RF, photonics and MEMS elements within the system. Tanner EDA provides an integrated, top-down design flow for IoT design that supports all these design domains. Learn more about key solutions that the Tanner design flow offers for successful IoT system design and verification. Download Now