I am updating a calculation where the bearing pressure at the toe of a gravity dam is calculated in the usual way, depending on whether the resultant is in the middle third. Uplift is initially assumed to be a straight line from heel to toe and adjusted by iteration to full headwater pressure if a crack occurs at the heel. All of this makes total sense; however, the engineer who prepared the calculations (no longer with company) adds tailwater pressure to the calculated pressure at the toe. For example pressure at the toe per unit width with R in middle third is calculated as R/BASE LENGTH)(1+6e/BASE LENGTH) + tailwater pressure.
Does anyone agree that it is correct to add the tailwater pressure? Why? Is it a pore pressure thing?
Red Flag Submitted
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.
Reply To This Thread
Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.
There are many new business models emerging in the manufacturing technology (MT) ecosystem. Most innovators had a broad set of skills that combined technical know-how with proven business experience. They saw a need in the market that was not being met by current solutions and turned this into a business opportunity. Download Now
Modern vehicles are highly sophisticated systems incorporating electrical, electronic, software and mechanical components. Mechanical systems are giving way to advanced software and electronic devices, driving automakers to innovate and differentiate their vehicles via the electric and electronic (E/E) architecture. As the pace of change accelerates, automotive companies need to evolve their development processes to deliver and maximize the value of these architectures. Download Now
Modern cars, trucks, and other vehicles feature an ever-increasing number of sophisticated electrical and electronic features, placing a larger burden on the wiring harness that enables these new features. As complexity rises, current harness manufacturing methods are struggling to keep pace due to manual data exchanges and the inability to capture tribal knowledge. A model-based wire harness manufacturing engineering flow automates data exchange and captures tribal knowledge through design rules to help harness manufacturers improve harness quality and boost efficiency. Download Now
This paper will focus on the quantification of the complexity related costs in harness variations in order to model them, allowing automated algorithms to optimize for these costs. A number of real world examples will be provided as well. Since no two businesses are alike, it is the aim of this paper to provide the foundational knowledge and methodology so the reader can assess their own business to model how variation complexity costs affect their business. Download Now