×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

ISO 15611 - WPS based on previous experience

ISO 15611 - WPS based on previous experience

ISO 15611 - WPS based on previous experience

(OP)
Hi everyone,

I was looking into the standard ISO 15611 regarding qualification of WPS based on previous welding experience. The documentation must include some investigation and/or some test data. How do I ensure that I have enough amount of documentation? For example: Is it enough if I have a successful penetration test certificate from a third party company?

I have found a similar question before: https://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=368753

Thank you.

RE: ISO 15611 - WPS based on previous experience

Chris, I understand your question. What would be the application for which you want to use this WPS? Most WPSs I know of, say for structural welding or pressure equipment, won’t accept this part of ISO. I think the applications are practically limited.

RE: ISO 15611 - WPS based on previous experience

(OP)
Hi, and thank you for your answer.
Well, my company is manufacturing instruments to many types of industries. You say that this part of ISO is limited, is it said so in relevant standard (for example in relevant piping standard)? Or how do you know that you can't use this standard to qualify a WPS?



RE: ISO 15611 - WPS based on previous experience

Most engineering codes, like EN 13445 and EN13480, require third party approvsal on welding procedures/qualifications for pressure retaining items. This is inline with the PED, which makes sense since both standard are harmonized.
EN 13445-4:2018 e.g. says:

Quote:

7.3 Welding procedure qualification record (WPQR)
Welding procedure specifications to be used in production shall be qualified by reference to an appropriate WPQR.
...
.
...
For welds other than pressure retaining welds directly attached to the pressure vessels e.g. tray rings, support feet,
etc. welding procedure specifications may be acceptable by holding welding procedure approval records carried out
in accordance with EN ISO 15611:2003 and EN ISO 15612:2004
.

Same goes for EN 13480

Quote:

9.3 Welding procedures
9.3.1 Verification of suitability

The suitability of the intended welding procedures shall be verified on the basis of a welding procedure
qualification in accordance with Table 9.3.1‐1.

Table 9.3.1-1 does list EN ISO 15611:2003 for PED category 0 (i.e. art 4.3) and I. More specifically, for category 0 resp. I;

Quote (category 0)

Welding procedures in the pressure envelope shall be qualified in accordance
with EN ISO 15614‐1:2004, EN ISO 15611:2003, EN ISO 15612:2004 or
EN ISO 15613:2004.
Welding procedures in non‐pressure retaining parts shall be qualified in
accordance with EN ISO 15610:2003.

Quote (category I)

Welding procedures for the pressure envelope shall be qualified in accordance
with EN ISO 15614‐1:2004 or EN ISO 15613:2004 as relevant unless the design
specifications specify that EN ISO 15611:2003 or EN ISO 15612:2004 is
acceptable.

What it boils down to, I guess, is that if the product your designing is not covered by any standard, you usually are 'free' to choose whatever you like.

What you typically see in the industry is that companies either have qualified WPSs'en WPQ's, acc. EN ISO 15614 resp EN ISO 9606. For work or products not requiring a qualified WPSs, companies often dont bother making a WPS at all, hence you dont see EN ISO 15611 a lot.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close