×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Broms - Overload Factor/Undercapacity Factor vs. Load Factors of Ultimate or Service Wind loads

Broms - Overload Factor/Undercapacity Factor vs. Load Factors of Ultimate or Service Wind loads

Broms - Overload Factor/Undercapacity Factor vs. Load Factors of Ultimate or Service Wind loads

(OP)
In regards to Broms analysis for laterally loaded piles it is my understanding he recommended a 2 to 3 overload factor and a 0.7 undercapacity factor which is alternately considered a 3/0.7=4.3 or 2/0.7=2.9 safety factor. It is my understanding Broms is a considered an ultimate strength method. In dealing with the design of a drilled shaft foundation where one has lateral load design reactions (shear and moment) resulting from a service(asd) wind load combination, I am questioning whether one should increase the service (asd) wind load reactions to a strength level or not. Obviously the Broms method is older but I assume the "overload factors" were load factors and the undercapacity factor was like a strength reduction factor as a corollary to LRFD.

In example in dealing with load combinations pre asce 7-10 where service wind speeds were used load combinations were generally:

ASD: W
LRFD: 1.6w

The question in dealing with service asd wind load reactions should you apply the 1.6 in addition to the saftey factor? i.e. 1.6x4.3 or 1.6x2.9?

Or ASCE 7-10 and older:

ASD: 0.6W
LRFD: W

4.3/0.6
2.9/0.6

This seems over-conservative to me and the overload factors should be considered the load factor and you should stick with an overall factor of safety using service asd reactions of just 4.3 & 2.9.

Interested in others thoughts

RE: Broms - Overload Factor/Undercapacity Factor vs. Load Factors of Ultimate or Service Wind loads

In addition to being an ultimate strength method, Broms is also a very approximate method. In my cicles it is rarely used, except as a quick and dirty hand method until I can run a P-y analysis.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - Functional Prototyping Using Metal 3D Printing
Functional prototypes are a key step in product development – they give engineers a chance to test new ideas and designs while also revealing how the product will stand up to real-world use. And when it comes to functional prototypes, 3D printing is rewriting the rules of what’s possible. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close