×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Broms - Overload Factor/Undercapacity Factor vs. Load Factors of Ultimate or Service Wind loads

Broms - Overload Factor/Undercapacity Factor vs. Load Factors of Ultimate or Service Wind loads

Broms - Overload Factor/Undercapacity Factor vs. Load Factors of Ultimate or Service Wind loads

(OP)
In regards to Broms analysis for laterally loaded piles it is my understanding he recommended a 2 to 3 overload factor and a 0.7 undercapacity factor which is alternately considered a 3/0.7=4.3 or 2/0.7=2.9 safety factor. It is my understanding Broms is a considered an ultimate strength method. In dealing with the design of a drilled shaft foundation where one has lateral load design reactions (shear and moment) resulting from a service(asd) wind load combination, I am questioning whether one should increase the service (asd) wind load reactions to a strength level or not. Obviously the Broms method is older but I assume the "overload factors" were load factors and the undercapacity factor was like a strength reduction factor as a corollary to LRFD.

In example in dealing with load combinations pre asce 7-10 where service wind speeds were used load combinations were generally:

ASD: W
LRFD: 1.6w

The question in dealing with service asd wind load reactions should you apply the 1.6 in addition to the saftey factor? i.e. 1.6x4.3 or 1.6x2.9?

Or ASCE 7-10 and older:

ASD: 0.6W
LRFD: W

4.3/0.6
2.9/0.6

This seems over-conservative to me and the overload factors should be considered the load factor and you should stick with an overall factor of safety using service asd reactions of just 4.3 & 2.9.

Interested in others thoughts

RE: Broms - Overload Factor/Undercapacity Factor vs. Load Factors of Ultimate or Service Wind loads

In addition to being an ultimate strength method, Broms is also a very approximate method. In my cicles it is rarely used, except as a quick and dirty hand method until I can run a P-y analysis.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - How ESI is Helping Move New Medical Device Product to Market Quicker & More Cost Effic
Early Supplier Involvement has long been a strategy employed by manufacturers to produce innovative products. Now, it almost seems like a necessity. Because decisions made in the design phase can positively affect product quality and costs, this can help add value to OEM bottom lines. This white paper will discuss many facets of ESI, including why it’s so valuable today, what challenges limit the benefits of ESI, how cost is impacted, and more. Download Now
White Paper - Moving to a Driverless Future
This white paper describes what we see as the best practices to support a sustainable engineering process for autonomous vehicle design. It exposes how to use simulation and testing in common frameworks to enable design exploration, verification and validation for the development of autonomous cars at a system, software and full-vehicle level to drive a mature product development process for automated driving. Download Now
Research Report - How Engineers are Using Remote Access
Remote access enables engineers to work from anywhere provided they have an internet connection. We surveyed our audience of engineers, designers and product managers to learn how they use remote access within their organizations. We wanted to know which industries have adopted remote access, which software they are using, and what features matter most. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close