Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Broms - Overload Factor/Undercapacity Factor vs. Load Factors of Ultimate or Service Wind loads

Broms - Overload Factor/Undercapacity Factor vs. Load Factors of Ultimate or Service Wind loads

Broms - Overload Factor/Undercapacity Factor vs. Load Factors of Ultimate or Service Wind loads

In regards to Broms analysis for laterally loaded piles it is my understanding he recommended a 2 to 3 overload factor and a 0.7 undercapacity factor which is alternately considered a 3/0.7=4.3 or 2/0.7=2.9 safety factor. It is my understanding Broms is a considered an ultimate strength method. In dealing with the design of a drilled shaft foundation where one has lateral load design reactions (shear and moment) resulting from a service(asd) wind load combination, I am questioning whether one should increase the service (asd) wind load reactions to a strength level or not. Obviously the Broms method is older but I assume the "overload factors" were load factors and the undercapacity factor was like a strength reduction factor as a corollary to LRFD.

In example in dealing with load combinations pre asce 7-10 where service wind speeds were used load combinations were generally:

LRFD: 1.6w

The question in dealing with service asd wind load reactions should you apply the 1.6 in addition to the saftey factor? i.e. 1.6x4.3 or 1.6x2.9?

Or ASCE 7-10 and older:

ASD: 0.6W


This seems over-conservative to me and the overload factors should be considered the load factor and you should stick with an overall factor of safety using service asd reactions of just 4.3 & 2.9.

Interested in others thoughts

RE: Broms - Overload Factor/Undercapacity Factor vs. Load Factors of Ultimate or Service Wind loads

In addition to being an ultimate strength method, Broms is also a very approximate method. In my cicles it is rarely used, except as a quick and dirty hand method until I can run a P-y analysis.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper - Considerations for choosing a 3D printing technology
The adoption of 3D printing into major companies’ product development life cycles is a testament to the technology’s incredible benefits to consumers, designers, engineers and manufacturers. While traditional production methods have limitations in manufacturability, 3D printing provides unparalleled design freedom due to the additive method of building parts layer by layer. Download Now
White Paper - Are all 3D printed metals the same?
With so many different 3D printing metal systems and processes today, how can you know exactly what you’re getting? Today, there are several different methods for manufacturing 3D printed metal components with their own strengths and limits. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close