×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Primary consolidation vs Secondary Consolidation
4

Primary consolidation vs Secondary Consolidation

Primary consolidation vs Secondary Consolidation

(OP)
Gents,

Is there any relationship or rule of thumb between primary consolidation vs secondary consolidation?. Such as Secondary should be ~20% of primary?. I know that the design life would affect somewhat the secondary consolidation.

I am asking this question because I am doing some consolidation analyses, but noticed that my primary consolidation values are around 0.5 to 0.9 in, whereas secondary consolidation values are around 2 and 3 in (design life 30 years). I am not sure about this. I thought they are supposed to be lower that primary consolidation.

Please let me know,

thanks.

RE: Primary consolidation vs Secondary Consolidation

2
I wouldn't think so. I'll also be pedantic and claim my preference not to use the term, "Consolidation" when speaking of secondary compression. I reserve consolidation to the behavior that's coupled to permeability. Secondary compression is settlement that occurs when the excessive pore pressures have dissipated.

f-d

ípapß gordo ainÆt no madre flaca!

RE: Primary consolidation vs Secondary Consolidation

There are relationships between the creep index Cα and the compression index Cc: typically just ratios of Cα/Cc for different soils. However, this only relates a rate of compression and the two phenomena are different as fattdad states. Moreover, you won't get a 'typical' ratio of the settlement components since the timescale and causes for each are different.

I agree that your secondary compression appears relatively high, but it is over a period of 30 years. Supposing you've undertaken a traditional approach to settlement analysis, in which the time to the end of primary consolidation is controlled by the cv parameter, perhaps adjusting that cv parameter will delay the onset of secondary compression, and you'd get more sensible answers. This might not be conservative, of course.

Generally I think all creep models are not quite right. An isotach-type approach seems more theoretically correct to me, but you can still get very high predictions of secondary compression, which doesn't seem right. It's likely because factors which counteract creep (i.e. swelling) are no included in those models, which is why they don't tend to reflect reality.

RE: Primary consolidation vs Secondary Consolidation

(OP)
Thanks!.

RE: Primary consolidation vs Secondary Consolidation

Re "Secondary compression is settlement that occurs when the excessive pore pressures have dissipated." This is only Hypothesis A, another one is "secondary compression also occurs during primary consolidation".

RE: Primary consolidation vs Secondary Consolidation

(didn't want to go there!)

f-d

ípapß gordo ainÆt no madre flaca!

RE: Primary consolidation vs Secondary Consolidation

For a given layer at a given depth, primary consolidation is approximately proportional to the increase in pressure above the preconsolidation pressure. Secondary compression is a function of time after primary consolidation ends; it does not increase with load. So if you double the load added after virgin consolidation begins, primary consolidation settlement doubles, but secondary compression settlement stays constant. Therefore there cannot be a unique ratio between the two for a given type of soil.

RE: Primary consolidation vs Secondary Consolidation

Primary consolidation also occurs prior to preconsolidation pressure; it's just the stress-strain gradient that changes after reaching the preconsolidation pressure. While a conventional text book approach would suggest there is no load magnitude effect in secondary consolidation, there clearly is. This is one of many reasons why the 'conventional' approach to calculating secondary consolidation is flawed.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - Considerations for choosing a 3D printing technology
The adoption of 3D printing into major companies’ product development life cycles is a testament to the technology’s incredible benefits to consumers, designers, engineers and manufacturers. While traditional production methods have limitations in manufacturability, 3D printing provides unparalleled design freedom due to the additive method of building parts layer by layer. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close