×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Seismic effect- irrigation channel

Seismic effect- irrigation channel

Seismic effect- irrigation channel

(OP)
i am currently designing an irrigation channel which requires application of compression springs along with seismic loads. i have defined seismic loads first (load no. 4). i have used repeat load cases to combine all the loads(https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=...)

In summary, i can see the moments being introduced due to seismic forces but it seems they are not being combined with other load cases. For eg. the forces summary for load cases excluding and including seismic forces is exactly the same (https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=..., https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=... )?

i am unable to exactly pin point the problem as to why earthquake effect is not combining?

RE: Seismic effect- irrigation channel

Could you post the STAAD file? (Or preferably, the text of the Edit file.)

RE: Seismic effect- irrigation channel

Could you paste the text of the edit file into a post? I cannot get this to work.

EDIT: Never mind.....I was able to get it. Will get back to you.

RE: Seismic effect- irrigation channel

Ok I think the issue is your seismic load. You are using some sort of generation command that I don't recognize. On my end, I changed that to a self-weight in the X-Direction and it combined the load cases just fine.

When I ran it with the command you are using, it gave the following warning in the output file:

**WARNING: IF THIS UBC/IBC ANALYSIS HAS TENSION/COMPRESSION
OR REPEAT LOAD OR RE-ANALYSIS OR SELECT OPTIMIZE, THEN EACH
UBC/IBC CASE SHOULD BE FOLLOWED BY PERFORM ANALYSIS & CHANGE.

So that may be your issue. It may be just faster to work up a percentage of self-weight and do what I was talking about before.

By the way, are you certain you need a seismic load here? I've never seen one on a trench before. (Of course, then again, I haven't done that many in high seismic zones.)

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close