Visual, tensiles & bends (all full thickness) were performed on this 1-1/2" thick procedure qualification joint per ASME Section IX-17. Impact testing was performed per ASME Section VIII-15 Division 1 UG84. When the impact testing was performed it was inadvertently tested as a single process joint. Therefore only 1 set of weld impacts and 2 sets of HAZ impacts were removed per the code as shown on the attached sketch. My question is what do I need to do to get this corrected? Do I have to re-weld this exact joint and then remove 1 set of GTAW weld metal impacts and 1 set of GTAW HAZ impacts from the GTAW portion of the joint? Could I get by with just welding up a 1/2" thick plate, GTAW all the way out, and remove 1 set of HAZ and 1 set of weld metal?
This brief provides a high level summary of advancements in Mentorâ€™s AMS Verification solutions since we saw you all last year at DAC 2019 in Las Vegas. Products featured: Analog FastSPICE Platform, Symphony Mixed-Signal Platform, Solido Variation Designer, and Solido Characterization Suite. Download Now
This resource will help you find key sessions-panels at DAC from researchers, customers, and our expert technologists; and various resources detailing the recent innovations in HLS, Verification, and RTL Low-Power since DAC 2019. Download Now
Among the challenges in the design flow has been aligning the metrics for design-for-test and for functional safety. This paper describes using logic built-in-self-test as both a functional safety mechanism and as a part of in-system testing, which allows for alignment of metrics required for safety certifications. Download Now
IoT systems are multi-domain designs that often require AMS, Digital, RF, photonics and MEMS elements within the system. Tanner EDA provides an integrated, top-down design flow for IoT design that supports all these design domains. Learn more about key solutions that the Tanner design flow offers for successful IoT system design and verification. Download Now