×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Impacts Section VIII

Impacts Section VIII

Impacts Section VIII

(OP)
Visual, tensiles & bends (all full thickness) were performed on this 1-1/2" thick procedure qualification joint per ASME Section IX-17. Impact testing was performed per ASME Section VIII-15 Division 1 UG84. When the impact testing was performed it was inadvertently tested as a single process joint. Therefore only 1 set of weld impacts and 2 sets of HAZ impacts were removed per the code as shown on the attached sketch. My question is what do I need to do to get this corrected? Do I have to re-weld this exact joint and then remove 1 set of GTAW weld metal impacts and 1 set of GTAW HAZ impacts from the GTAW portion of the joint? Could I get by with just welding up a 1/2" thick plate, GTAW all the way out, and remove 1 set of HAZ and 1 set of weld metal?

RE: Impacts Section VIII

Follow your Non Conformance section of your companies Quality Control Manual.

RE: Impacts Section VIII

(OP)
The question was related to the code, which my QCM is not going to answer. I am trying to finish the procedure with out re-running all the impacts, if that is possible.

RE: Impacts Section VIII

This is a WPS nonconformance and to use this WPS for impact qualification for GTAW requires welding a coupon exactly following the WPS and impact qualify the GTAW portion.

RE: Impacts Section VIII

(OP)
Thanks

RE: Impacts Section VIII

You can weld a supplementary test coupon however it shall meet all the essential variables of the existing WPS.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - Implementing a Multi-Domain System
IoT systems are multi-domain designs that often require AMS, Digital, RF, photonics and MEMS elements within the system. Tanner EDA provides an integrated, top-down design flow for IoT design that supports all these design domains. Learn more about key solutions that the Tanner design flow offers for successful IoT system design and verification. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close