×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Help on a darlington
6

Help on a darlington

Help on a darlington

(OP)
Despite the risk of being cast back to school, I'll ask help on this dimmer circuit for a LED strip

I have:

- MJE13003 - http://www.onsemi.com/pub/Collateral/MJE13003-D.PD...
- 2N3904 - https://www.onsemi.com/pub/Collateral/2N3903-D.PDF
- 1k and 10k pots available
- Many resistors

This MJE, by my understanding, has a low gain, so I need another one to drive it (darlington).
2N3904 was the chosen, since I have a sack of a hundred
(94 now that I toasted six of them)

The LED strip, on a 12V supply, consumes 700mA. When in series with the saturated* MJE13003, the current drops to 400mA. Maybe this is expected, since the transistor has a drop of ~0.7V
*Base shorted to the 12V

But the actual problem I seek help on is on the 2N3904: it's at less than half of it's supported current (79mA Vs. 200mA), smoking almost instantaneously, and no heatsink is possible (TO92).

Here's what I have:

Important: this 1.87V after the diode is while floating the collector of the 2N3904. If I connect it to the 12V, the voltage after the diode goes to 5.3V, and zero current

I tried sticking the collector of the 2N3904 and the resistors AFTER the LED strip, and it doesn't heat up. But even shortening the base in this scenario doesn't drive enough current to the MJE (300mA or less)

RE: Help on a darlington

That not a Darlington connection. Just a driver transistor configured to short the supply via the 3904 and the B-E junction of the MJE transistor.

Consider using a FET instead.

RE: Help on a darlington

Would it be better with the collector of the first transistor connected to the collector of the second?
(And i still want to see a base resistor rather than the diode)

RE: Help on a darlington

I would use PWM. And a FET. Much less heat.
Can the strip run off 12 V? That is not a very long strip.

Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
--------------------------------------
Half full - Half empty? I don't mind. It's what in it that counts.

RE: Help on a darlington

As Gunnar wrote, use PWM.

Virtually 100% of commercial LED brightness control is with PWM. Even the cheapest eBay $1 (shipped) LED Strip controller.

RE: Help on a darlington

(OP)
"The part is rated for 0.6W, and you are attempting to to dump 2W into it?"

I didn't see that !
Or did not remember that controlling only the current was not enough

"Consider using a FET instead."

Heard FETs dissipate too much when working on a linear zone
The following would fix it:

"I would use PWM. And a FET"

Me too. I was tempted to it. But benefits aside... I'd like not to complicate things for the moment (to this unskilled guy it is). This is just half of a bigger room "automation" system. Should be quick kill.
But curious: what frequency and oscillator type would you apply here ?

The LED strip has 5 meter. Diodes grouped 3 by 3, with their respective resistors.


"And i still want to see a base resistor rather than the diode"

The 5.1k resistor was calulated for that purpose.
As the pot has a minimal resistance of 30 ohms, the voltage on the divider never reaches zero, demanding the diode to cut off.

"Would it be better with the collector of the first transistor connected to the collector of the second?"
I already attempted. Even leaving no resistor between collector and base (shortening), the current was too low to drive the MJE

But considering all the factors and suggestions, it's clear that I should go back to darlington instead of "driver"

In this configuration, the voltage on the collectors is 1V. That's probably why the current is too low on the driving transistor

I realised that a voltage divider can be put between the 12V and this driver's base
I'll report the results for those interested.

Thank you all

If nothing works, I'll buy the commercial dimmer and sell my certificate
But as this circuit is part of a larger solution, I'd like it to be integrated

RE: Help on a darlington

If you connect the collectors of the driver and power transistor then you will at least have a Darlington pair. That should stop the burn-outs and allow your testing to move forward if you're determined to use a linear regulator.

I agree that PWM is probably a better solution overall, and if you do that then a FET is a good choice because the losses in the FET are typically lower than in a BJT. The advantages are more prevalent at low voltages because a BJT's saturated VCE drop is usually larger than a FET on-state IR drop.

RE: Help on a darlington

The old 555 works well, but may have "end" problems - not going fully to 0% D.C. and not quite up to 100%. Frequency? Anything above flicker limit. A hundred Hz and up.

Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
--------------------------------------
Half full - Half empty? I don't mind. It's what in it that counts.

RE: Help on a darlington

I'd put a resistor in the emitter of the 13003. Say, maybe 1 ohm. That will give you some current stability feedback.

RE: Help on a darlington

(OP)
I gave up and migrated to PWM

It works good. Only two FETs totaled on the process (that's a win dazed)

But as predicted, there is no such a thing as 0% duty cycle, so the light never goes off
There's 1% or something close, but no zero

Kudos to whoever solves this. No idea came out of me.

I have this:


Pot: 1k
Diodes: 1N4007
FET: Si2302DS

Resulting frequency is something between 500Hz and 1kHz. Well defined square wave.
But that can be reduced to fit the solution, although it will cost me a fatter capacitor or a larger pot. Both undesired

RE: Help on a darlington

Instead of a 555, try an SG3524 or SG3525 if they're still available. 0% - 100% duty cycle modulation.

RE: Help on a darlington

You bet me to it, Scotty.

But there is another way out. It will only cost you a small capacitor and it will help reducing EMI down to levels that may help you getting the product (if it is going to be one) okayed by EMC test houses.

The PWM has, as you observed, Clean and Sharp edges. That means that the current into the LED strip contains lots of HF harmonics. The original astable flip-flop, which was used Before the 555 and its cousins were available, was also named "Multivibrator" because its output was so rich in harmonics. And the 555 is richer, still, because of the optimized design.

To get rid of those harmonics, you can add a capacitor between Gate and GND. That will ramp up the gate voltage so that it never reaches turn on threshold at low duty cycles like 1% and that keeps the LED:s dark while allowing Close to full output at 99%. You will need a C that produces 1 - 10 us and that means a C like 1 nF or thereabout.

How would that help fighting EMI? Simply by reducing the di/dt in the LED chain and, since upper HF limit is proportional to di/dt, you can control the HF emission with the same capacitor.

There may be one problem; the FET will not switch as fast as before and that means some extra thermal load (stays in linear region somewhat longer). I wouldn't bother too much about that. Just try out a suitable capacitor that turns the LED:s dark at lowest D.C. and keep a finger on the FET to feel if it gets hot. And remember - hot means a lot more than 50 C, where your finger thinks it is hot.

Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
--------------------------------------
Half full - Half empty? I don't mind. It's what in it that counts.

RE: Help on a darlington

(OP)
Awesome, man

Worked perfectly. 3nF did the trick. No heating at all.

Good to know about this harmonics handling method (we all know how to get rid of noises, but some of us need a reminder sometimes)

Good to know about this SG3524 too. Although this capacitor trick is an elegant and cheap solution

Two stones with a single bird


Thank you all

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close