×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

soil resistance distribution on an underground "beam"

soil resistance distribution on an underground "beam"

soil resistance distribution on an underground "beam"

(OP)
I am working on a concept for design of a helical anchor plate. I have come up with a process that I need to try and make more efficient. My question is how would you apply the soil resistance to what is essentially looked at as a cantilever beam (unit section of the plate)? Is the resistance applied as a uniformly distributed load? Or because of the stiffness at the fixed end (plate/shaft interface) would the resistance be more applied as a linearly increasing distributed load (max at the fixed end). If that isn't clear, see the attachment.

RE: soil resistance distribution on an underground "beam"

Lacking some way to measure stresses in the plate, I'd use a triangular distribution, but with the load varying from near zero at the connection to max at the for outside end.

RE: soil resistance distribution on an underground "beam"

(OP)
Thanks for the response!

Is there any way you can show me some resources that back up what you said? I will have to explain to my boss my reasoning for loading it with a triangular distribution with the max at the "free" end.

Thanks

RE: soil resistance distribution on an underground "beam"

OG again. Having seen the results of test borings (hey I'm old) where the boring is advanced with continuous flight augers, the main distortion being at the outer edges and considered the likelihood of the anchor being behind a rock or rocks, the load probably should all be placed on the outer edge,not distributed. Running an actual test in soil versus rocks, you will find out. My bet is the rocks by far are more load on the edge mainly.

RE: soil resistance distribution on an underground "beam"

I don't know of much in the way of resources, but what OG proposes makes sense when you consider that presumably there are multiple 'plates' along the shaft, so one flight is somewhat 'in the shadow' of the flight above or below. If your helical plate is only one turn, then you might have an argument for the uniform distribution. The plate would have to be very flexible (and only one turn) to have a distribution that would be substantially higher on the connected side in most (possibly all) soils.

RE: soil resistance distribution on an underground "beam"

There is nothing in FHWA's GEC No. 4 about helical anchors, except for a very brief mention on page 10 as "other types of anchors." Your best bet is to talk to the tech support at the major helical anchor suppliers.

www.PeirceEngineering.com

RE: soil resistance distribution on an underground "beam"

I had the impression of that the torque stress during the installation may control the design of the plate...

RE: soil resistance distribution on an underground "beam"

You can find "Elastic Solutions for Soil and Rock Mechanics" by Poulos and Davis on line for free. Figure 7.3 on Page 166 shows the stress distribution under a rigid circular plate. I have questions about the numbers, but it is obvious that the contact pressure near the edge of the plate is much higher than near the center.

My mind understands it like this: A flexible, uniformly-loaded circular area deflects more at the center than at the edge because the pressure dissipates rapidly under the edge, due to the absence of load beyond the edge. Witness the dishing of flexible tank floors. To force the circle to settle uniformly, much higher pressure has to be applied near the edge.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper – Choosing the Right Spring Loaded Connector
In today’s cost-sensitive world, designers are often driven to specify the lowest cost solution for every aspect of their designs to ensure that their solution is competitively priced and their company remains profitable. However, specifying a low-cost, low-quality connector solution can result in premature failure, considerable re-work costs and damage to reputations. Download Now
eBook – Own the Lifecycle: Sustainable Business Transformation
Increasingly, product and services companies are seeking more information and control in the operational lifecycle of their products, including service and use. Better information about the operational lifecycle, and the ability to use that information, requires more than just unstructured data flowing back from products in the field. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close