×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Canadian Institute of Steel Construction - recommendations re: non-conforming structural steels

Canadian Institute of Steel Construction - recommendations re: non-conforming structural steels

Canadian Institute of Steel Construction - recommendations re: non-conforming structural steels

(OP)
Hey all!

In 2016, the CISC quietly posted an article on their website recommending that engineers only specify steels produced in Canada, USA and the EU. They cite concerns with fraudulent mill test reports and high concentrations of elements not normally tested for in North American Standards (boron appears to be the primary concern).

We've changed our specifications to match CISC's recommendations, but I know that other structural engineers in our small market have not (most, if not all, are probably unaware of CISC's position). Now contractors are complaining that we're difficult to work with and telling Owner's that buildings are going to cost more if we're involved.

In the past 6 months, we've had steel from Russia, S. Korea and Turkey show up on our job sites. Per CISC recommendations, we've insisted on having the material tested, which resulted in additional costs and small delays. The testing was performed despite having mill test reports for all members (due to concerns regarding fraudulent reporting). All members tested met the CSA/ASTM standards, but some were found to be close to, but not exceeding, the recommended 0.0008% boron limit. Very few mill test reports will even note the boron content of the steel.

I'm very curious to hear what other structural engineers are doing with regards to global steels. Are you satisfied that mill test reports are accurate? Do you force suppliers to confirm the boron content in their steel? Are we being unreasonable?

Thanks for your time!

Harley

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - Design for Additive Manufacturing
With a growing number of parts manufactured directly by additive manufacturing techniques, it is important to lay down design principles suitable for such manufacturing processes and to ensure parts are designed for additive manufacturing. There are several factors that are to be considered at the design stage. Few such design issues in additive manufacturing are discussed in this paper. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close