×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Statically indeterminate continuous beam using double integration

Statically indeterminate continuous beam using double integration

Statically indeterminate continuous beam using double integration

(OP)
Hi Everyone,

I'm trying to find the reaction load at point A using the double integration method. (I know there are simple and less time consuming method than double integration).

The problem I have is, I'm getting different reaction load when I compare it with the reaction load I get from SAP model program. (difference by almost 4kN)

Can anyone find any problem or error with my hand calculation? Does my calculation make sense? or am I making any mistake?

Thank you

RE: Statically indeterminate continuous beam using double integration

In equation 4, shouldnt the 0.25Ra x^3 term actually be 0.5/3 instead of 0.5/2?
I stopped going further.

RE: Statically indeterminate continuous beam using double integration

Be aware that Sap automatically considers shear deformation effects which you don’t consider in your calculations.

Jason McKee
proud R&D Manager of
Cross Section Analysis & Design
Software for the structural design of cross sections
Moment Curvature Analysis
Interaction Diagrams
Reinforcement Design etc.

RE: Statically indeterminate continuous beam using double integration

I'd imagine the shear deformations would be fairly minor in comparison to the flexural deformations given the length of spans involved compared with the implied beam depths. So percentage error would be fairly small between a analysis accounting & not accounting for shear deformations, certainly enough to get fairly close agreement to confirm the hand or computer analysis was of the correct order. Suspect the rounding off of significant figures involved in some terms in the hand analysis would have more of an effect on the 'exact' answer than the exclusion of the shear deformation.

Don't discount the fact that there might be something wrong in the SAP2000 model also! (You never know, I've certainly seen my fair share of people including myself on occasion accidentally entering loads or stiffnesses and being an order (or two) of magnitude out)

RE: Statically indeterminate continuous beam using double integration

I would approach this a different way:

Remove the reaction at B and replace the cantilever with a shear and moment applied at C. compute the deflection at B for the new reduced simply structure then compute the restoring force ie the load at B that would produce the inverse of that deflection on a single simple span beam. Once you know the reaction at B then it is just simple statics to get the reaction at A.

As to your calc:
Looks like you swapped your sign convention on the moment at section D for Md and section E for Me.
EIY at section D 0.5/2 Ra x^3 should be 0.5/3 Ra x^3


Open Source Structural Applications: https://github.com/buddyd16/Structural-Engineering

RE: Statically indeterminate continuous beam using double integration

Hello

I have the beam program in ACAD Mech 2018. If you post your cross section dimensions (for I) I could give you the reactions. It can be done quite quickly.

RE: Statically indeterminate continuous beam using double integration

I get 4.2182 kN for reaction A.

Try your beam model on Optimal Beam (online beam calculator), it solves statically indeterminate continuous beams using Direct/Matrix Stiffness Method. The free version will give you the reactions.

https://optimalbeam.com/

You can specify unlimited support types and loading conditions on your beam model. It gives you support reactions, shear force, and bending moment diagrams in the free version. The paid gives additional perks such as deflection and stress diagrams, reports, and ability to save models.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close