×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

AISC Design Guide 1 - Base Plate Thickness

AISC Design Guide 1 - Base Plate Thickness

AISC Design Guide 1 - Base Plate Thickness

(OP)
I am attempting to design a base plate that is subject to a large moment in relation to the axial load applied (see attached)

My moment is 12.7 kip ft and the axial load is only 2.7 kip.

I am following the 'large moment' (load eccentricity is greater than bearing eccentricity) procedure in AISC's design guide #1. Using this procedure, I am come up with a really thick base-plate thickness.

It appears that the loading condition does not factor into AISC's equation for baseplate thickness. AISC just assumes you are going to need the full bearing capacity of whatever concrete you are bearing on. As a result, you will always get a really thick baseplate.

Am I understanding this correctly? Why would we always assume that we need the full 100% concrete bearing capacity under our plates? I would think that the plate thickness would be driven more by the loading condition applied to the plate versus the capacity of the concrete.

AISC's design guide #1 has an alternate procedure in the appendix of the design guide that yields much more reasonable base plate thicknesses.

I guess my question is....... Under what conditions would we ever want to use the primary procedure?


RE: AISC Design Guide 1 - Base Plate Thickness

I usually size my anchor rod based on shear and the tension developed. The moment arm I use is the centre of the anchor rod to the centroid of compression at the far edge of the base plate. I use a rectangular stress block and guess the 'd' value is 0.9 times the out dimension. I then use the force times the distance to the outside part of the column flange to determine the plate moment. I then use the plastic section bd^2/4 for design.

Dik

RE: AISC Design Guide 1 - Base Plate Thickness

I looked at example B.5.2 (also a "large moment" case), which uses the alternate triangular distribution approach you mentioned. It looks like that approach also assumes full concrete bearing capacity to determine the plate thickness, just with a triangular distribution. The "small moment" case, however, sizes the plate thickness based on the applied loads.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - The Criticality of the E/E Architecture
Modern vehicles are highly sophisticated systems incorporating electrical, electronic, software and mechanical components. Mechanical systems are giving way to advanced software and electronic devices, driving automakers to innovate and differentiate their vehicles via the electric and electronic (E/E) architecture. As the pace of change accelerates, automotive companies need to evolve their development processes to deliver and maximize the value of these architectures. Download Now
White Paper - Model Based Engineering for Wire Harness Manufacturing
Modern cars, trucks, and other vehicles feature an ever-increasing number of sophisticated electrical and electronic features, placing a larger burden on the wiring harness that enables these new features. As complexity rises, current harness manufacturing methods are struggling to keep pace due to manual data exchanges and the inability to capture tribal knowledge. A model-based wire harness manufacturing engineering flow automates data exchange and captures tribal knowledge through design rules to help harness manufacturers improve harness quality and boost efficiency. Download Now
White Paper - Modeling and Optimizing Wire Harness Costs for Variation Complexity
This paper will focus on the quantification of the complexity related costs in harness variations in order to model them, allowing automated algorithms to optimize for these costs. A number of real world examples will be provided as well. Since no two businesses are alike, it is the aim of this paper to provide the foundational knowledge and methodology so the reader can assess their own business to model how variation complexity costs affect their business. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close