×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

IEC - Ground Conductors for Low Voltage Motors

IEC - Ground Conductors for Low Voltage Motors

IEC - Ground Conductors for Low Voltage Motors

(OP)
thread741-115728: IEC-Armour as grounding conductor?

Reference to the above old thread, I have the same questions,

1. 4 Core Cables (All the 4 cores enclosed in the same cables), Can the 4th core be used as a grounding conductor?
2. Does IEC permit the laying of cables without ground conductor? If so, are there any conditions?
3. If the armor of the 3 Core cable can treated as ground conductor, What if the CSA of the cable is not sufficient to carry the fault current?
4. Does NEC permits the laying of phase cables without ground conductor at Medium voltages?
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

RE: IEC - Ground Conductors for Low Voltage Motors

  1. In principle yes. It depends if you can find somewhere to connect the earth conductor: many motors don't have a large internal earth stud or boss within the terminal box.
  2. In the UK it would be acceptable (i.e. not a code violation) to provide a local earth electrode without a metallic return path, but there are specific requirements imposed on TT systems, including provision of an RCD at the source. I don't recall actually seeing a motor installed this way though.
  3. Either use an internal conductor (but see 1 above) or run an external CPC alongside the armoured cable if the armour CSA is insufficient on its own. If the circuit conductors aren't adequate to handle the fault current then use a larger cable. If it is a marginal fail then going up to the next size of power cable (with a larger armour CSA) may be a more economical solution than running the separate CPC.
  4. No idea. The NEC belongs in the USA; us Europeans are vaguely aware of it.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close