## Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

## Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

(OP)

I have a copper coil wrapped around a stainless steel cylinder (please see attached). The temp. of inner surface of the cylinder is assumed to be 500C. Water will flow through the copper coil, entering at 20C and leaving at 60C (therefore the average water temp is 40C).

Now for the heat transfer from the coil wall to the water inside, Q=U A dT (W) can be used? I'm having difficulty in calculating U. Here, the area is the surface area of the coil. But, should dT be the difference between coil wall temp and avg. water temp? Before that, can I use same equation to determine heat transfer between cylinder and coil outer surface? Again, I'm having difficulty in U calc.

Once I have Q, I can use it to calculate the water flow rate required to achieve a gradient of 40C (60C-20C) for Q=m(mass flowrate) Cp dT (W)

It will be really helpful if anyone can please advice on U calculation. Also, on the method I have used to get flow rate.

Note: fuel is burnt inside the cylinder. However, to simplify the problem I am assuming the inside wall temp will be 500C.

Now for the heat transfer from the coil wall to the water inside, Q=U A dT (W) can be used? I'm having difficulty in calculating U. Here, the area is the surface area of the coil. But, should dT be the difference between coil wall temp and avg. water temp? Before that, can I use same equation to determine heat transfer between cylinder and coil outer surface? Again, I'm having difficulty in U calc.

Once I have Q, I can use it to calculate the water flow rate required to achieve a gradient of 40C (60C-20C) for Q=m(mass flowrate) Cp dT (W)

It will be really helpful if anyone can please advice on U calculation. Also, on the method I have used to get flow rate.

Note: fuel is burnt inside the cylinder. However, to simplify the problem I am assuming the inside wall temp will be 500C.

## RE: Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

Perry Chem Engg handbook gives guidance on the correction factors to be used for helical tubing with the base Dittus Boelter / Sieder Tate equation for the inside htc for the Cu tubing (between the tube ID and water).

B)To be cautious, I would only use say 80% of the Cu tube OD surface area when computing the heat transferred from the SS cylinder to the Cu tube, and coincidentally make some allowance for the fact that not all the Cu tube external surface will be at close to 500degC. A quantified estimate of this mean external surface temp can be made with input of the mean thickness of the conducting cement - so this is a thermal conductivity calc only.

C)Be careful with using water here - a critical calc will be to compute the Cu tube inside ID film temp, which must be estimated to be less than the boiling point of water at the min operating pressure of the flowing water. Else switch out for a higher boiling point coolant -see (E).

D)Purity of the circulating water will also be critical; use inhibited demineralised or DI water to avoid scaling; keep the DI / DM recirculating system expansion drum under N2 blanket.

E)A safe bet to avoid vapor blanketing / vapor lockup in these tubes is to switch out water with some high temperature stabilised hot oil, which could one of the popular Therminol HTFs' or similar mineral oils from ExxonMobil / Shell / Chevron etc. Select the hot oil which has a max continous permitted film temp > the computed max film temp in the Cu tube ID surface.

## RE: Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

I cannot add much to George's reply except that such coils are usually attached using the process of furnace brazing. Without doing this your heat transfer coefficient will be at least a factor of 10 lower.

## RE: Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

SO, how are you keeping the water from boiling, or are you assuming the copper pipes ARE pressurized and so are falling into ALL of the pressure vessel and boiler construction laws and certifications? If the wall temperature were much, much less - say 125 or 150 degrees, water could "possibly" be assumed to be in the tubes, even though portions of the tube near the wall are over 100 deg C. But you have a boiler present, multiphase flow and or very high pressure.

## RE: Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

The contact between the cylinder and tube is not that good. Therefore, burying the tube is a good suggestion.

I apologise for not mentioning that it is an open loop system for the water flowing through the tubes. That is why, I would like to calculate the flow rate required for the water to reach 60C. Too low flow rate could possibly produce steam and water temp will not reach 60C if too high. It is to get an approximate value of the flow rate, which can be used as the starting point for actively controlling the flow rate since in reality the flame temp. will vary a lot I guess.

I was assuming the following equivalent thermal circuit (It may be incorrect):

However, I am confused if this problem should be treated as the following:

But, in this case, how to define the copper tubes?

I haven't done any heat calculations for ages. Therefore, my skills are bit rusty. I wanted to simplify the problem as much as I could. Obviously, there are more accurate ways to do it. However, at the moment I would like to do some basic calculations. I can later do an parametric optimisation to fine tune the design. Any suggestion would be really helpful. Also, is there an easier way to calculate the temperature generated by burning say 1 kg of wood, using its heating value? Thanks in advance.

## RE: Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

You MUST get away from the theoretical algebra at this point and assume some OD cylinder, wall thickness cylinder, OD copper and wall thickness copper. THEN, and only then, can you calculate the maximum number of tubes running outside the cylinder, THEN the actual contact area of each tube and solder connection to OD of the inner cylinder. 15% to 20% max of cylinder circumference, unless you fill the gap completely with some paste or conductive filler compatible with your solder. Deposit the filler in the length of the gap after soldering with some long hypodermic syringe needle maybe?

You must determine this actual, practical area of effective heat transfer contact before continuing.

## RE: Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

The contact area is minimal in the above arrangement. My aim is to get some flow rate figures, to achieve that Tmax. If the figure is unrealistic, I can safely conclude that the design is impractical. Further modifications should be made, such as the one you suggested using smaller tubes running axially. Thanks.

## RE: Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

You are simplifying away some important information.

What fuel, and at what rate?

What happens to the combustion gas, and what temperature is it?

With those two things you at least have a rough idea of how much heat you need to deal with.

Then it's really simple to calculate the water flow required for a reasonableness assessment.

## RE: Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

My initial heat flow circuit with steady state assumption and adiabatic condition:

conduction from cylinder ID (assumed 500C) to its OD [logarithmic U value should be used for cylinders?]-> cylinder OD to copper tube OD [50% surface area?]-> cu tube OD to cu tube ID -> cu tube ID to water (avg. temp 40C) [struggling with h (w/m2K) value]

Any suggestions would be much appreciated. Thanks.

## RE: Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

The Dittus Boelter equation for the tube ID htc to flowing water is N_Nu = 0.023(N_Re^0.8)(N_Pr^0.33) since we can exclude skin viscosity effect correction for water. Presume you know what these terms mean. Properties should be calculated at the film temp, which is the average between tube wall temp and bulk fluid temp. Assume a film temp to get the iterative calcs started.

Off hand, 500degC for combustion flue gas seems rather low, unless you've got loads of excess combustion air.

## RE: Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

I can get some h values through iteration from Nu, assuming film temp. and flow velocity. However, the problem becomes a bit complex. Any ball park figure for the h value would be sufficient at this stage to come to a conclusion on the system's ability to prevent water from boiling.

500C for ID of cylinder is a crude assumption I had to make. There is a provision for air blow holes. But, I am trying to keep it as simple as possible.

If I can estimate/assume the amount of heat available from combustion, the problem would have been easier to solve I guess. :(

## RE: Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

Approaching this from another angle, Assuming you've set up this up countercurrently (flow of water goes downward to heat up , while flue gas goes upward to cool down), estimate the LMTD, given that you've got water going from 20degC to say 60degC, then apply Ui. Ai . LMTD = MCpdt to get you the required Ui for the actual Ai. Note that the the flue gas temp would cool down by an amount commensurate with the heat pick up by the water, so this helps to get the LMTD.

Adjust the values for Ui, LMTD, Ai till all assumed values match those estimated.

Then finally calculate the worst case film temp, which would be at the hot end of this system ( water exiting in contact with upcoming flue gas). Here we want to calculate the Cu ID wall or tubeskin temp, For this section, compute a local value of U for a small section of Cu tube using the same procedure as above. Get all assumed values to match up with those estimated. Then, finally estimate the tubeskin temp with input from localised value of Q. This is a step by step calc where you first compute the terminal temps across the combustion cylinder wall, then move down to compute the terminal temps across the brazing. End temp at brazing = Cu tubeskin temp. Then you have the estimate for film temp = 0.5 ( tubeskin t + bulk temp at this section). See if this is less than the lowest boiling point of water at this location. If this is not satisfactory, start all over again with higher Cu tubing surface area or increased water flow or both.

Look up your heat transfer text for the formula required to get to overall Ui where you sum all the resistances.

## RE: Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/water-liquid-ga...

## RE: Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

## RE: Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

## RE: Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

## RE: Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

Any suggestion would be helpful. TIA.

## RE: Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

Otherwise, you're ready to go with these iterations.

## RE: Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

As you mentioned earlier, after the converged Twall consequently Tfilm is achieved, if it is higher than the boiling temperature can we say that the current design parameters (tube dimensions, flow rate) does not satisfy the requirement?

## RE: Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

## RE: Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

It seems that the iteration process is valid for Tfilm < boling point, as the properties of water are evaluated at Tfilm. I am using CoolProp database and Matlab script to iterate. It is working, however, Tfilm > boiling point is fetching density of water at gaseous state. Therefore, the final value of Twall does not seem accurate (Dittus-Boelter equation is not valid ?!). I am trying out different input for velocity, tube dia, etc. My initial guess for Tfilm is always less than BP. I guess I need to set a criteria for Tfilm.

## RE: Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

TTFN (ta ta for now)

I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvg

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers Entire Forum list http://www.eng-tips.com/forumlist.cfm

## RE: Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

This is because your "assumption" that this single, small-diameter copper tube at a flowrate slow enough to allow/maintain laminar flow is not boiling is incorrect. The proposed solution (single copper coil at low flow) is unsafe, liable to steam bubbles and vapor lock, if not steam production and blowout.

## RE: Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

One query to @georgeverghese,

For the resistance in the thermal cement, I have assumed a concentric thermal cement where the copper tube is buried (as you suggested previously).

R = ln(r4/r3)/(2*pi*kcement*L)

My assumption for the L is the total coil height. Any suggestions on my assumption would be helpful.

Hopefully, limiting the film temperature to maximum 95C will be enough to prevent steam/two-phase problem. Currently, working out different tube sizing, flow velocity to achieve the desired bulk temp.

## RE: Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

One of your key assumptions is this 500degC for the inner surface of the cylinder, which will have to checked. Is this the worst case surface temp? This will most likely have an impact on the tube ID film temp.

## RE: Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculation

had assumed. Obviously, having a very low k value for the cement will increase the max. temp.

Ts=((1/(R3*UA))*(Twall-Tbulk)+Tbulk)

R3= 1/hc*Ai

As you can see from the image below, the copper tube is buried inside a concentric (with the cylinder) thermal cement with height Lc. For the first term in the right hand of the eqn, L is the cylinder height. For the 2nd term, I initially assumed the length to be equal to coil height (slightly smaller than cement layer height Lc). I am confused that if this is a valid approach or the cement should be concentric with the tube (in that case less thermal contact with the cylinder!?). This is the last piece of this puzzle. I have validated the approach assuming a low surface temperature, to get the wall temp.

The tube length is used to calculate the inner surface area of the tube.