×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Laminate Stiffness, Test vs Predicted

Laminate Stiffness, Test vs Predicted

Laminate Stiffness, Test vs Predicted

(OP)
Hello all.
When comparing the stiffness results from a tensile test of a lay-up (0/90/+/-45 in differenct combinations) with the stiffness predicted using classic laminate theory (CLT), I have noticed that it's not uncommon for CLT to overpredict the stiffness. The measured stiffness is usually around 10% less than the predicted value, this behaviour has appeared when testing both unidirectional and woven material. There is some difference in thickness but the difference is never large enough to justify such a difference in stiffness.
The values that we use as a basis for our models have been experimentally determined.

Is 10% accuracy as good as it gets with CLT or is this a particular behaviour for multi-oriented laminates that CLT does not capture?
Any input/thoughts or experience from eng-tips members would be much appreciated.

RE: Laminate Stiffness, Test vs Predicted

No, you should be getting much closer. Over what stran range is your lamina and laminate moduli? Are you using lamina tensile moduli? What is the fiber? Resin? At what temperature?

RE: Laminate Stiffness, Test vs Predicted

Also, are you using measured thicknesses to calc moduli, or a consistent nominal thickness? How are you experimentally measuring strain? What test method standards are you using?

RE: Laminate Stiffness, Test vs Predicted

(OP)
We are testing according to ASTM D3039M, mostly high modulus fibers cured at 180°C with 55% Vf for fabric and 58% for woven. But similar results is also observed when testing T700 UD laminate with higher resin contents (roughly 48%). We normally measure strain with extensometers, but we have also performed some samples with back-to-back strain gages to obtain similar stiffness values. All tests are performed at RT.

Regarding thickness I can provide the following example data. (Tests performed with the same batch of material).

0° woven test coupons, E1t = 111 GPa average (min =109 GPa), E2t = 106 GPa average (min = 102 GPa) with CPT between 0,29-,305 mm with the avearge being 0,3 mm.
[0/0/45/0/0]s laminate results in a laminate modulus of 93 GPa (experimentally determined), measured mean CPT 0,307 mm. CLT predicts around 100-103 GPa.


RE: Laminate Stiffness, Test vs Predicted

Here is some additional data. For the NCAMP IM7/8552 unidirectional material system (public domain), there was an average difference of 3% between the directly measured laminate tension/compression elastic moduli (3 different laminates at 3 environments) and the elastic properties determined from the ply properties and CLT (15 total data points).

Brian
www.espcomposites.com

RE: Laminate Stiffness, Test vs Predicted

Your CLT does not seem correct. I put E1=111 GPa, E2=106 GPa, G12=4 GPa, nu12 = 0.06 into my laminate code for [0/0/45/0/0]s and get Ex = 98.9 GPa. Correct this from 0.3 mm CPT to 0.307 mm CPT gives 96.6 GPa. Only off by ~ 4%.

But, what strain range did you use for lamina E1 and E2 moduli? What strain range did you use for laminate Ex moduli measurement? Are they the same?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources

eBook - Efficient and Effective Production Support with 3D Printed Jigs and Fixtures
Jigs and fixtures offer manufacturers a reliable process for delivering accurate, high-quality outcomes, whether for a specific part or feature, or for consistency across multiples of parts. Although the methodologies and materials for producing jigs and fixtures have evolved beyond the conventional metal tooling of years past, their position as a manufacturing staple remains constant due to the benefits they offer. Download Now
Overcoming Cutting Tool Challenges in Aerospace Machining
Aerospace manufacturing has always been on the cutting edge, from materials to production techniques. However, these two aspects of aerospace machining can conflict, as manufacturers strive to maintain machining efficiency with new materials by using new methods and cutting tools. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close