Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

Register Log in
  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Determining Moment at the Top of a Steel Column

Status
Not open for further replies.
SoFloJoe

SoFloJoe

Structural
Joined
Apr 3, 2018
Messages
76
Location
US
Hi All,

Newbie here! I am working on a structural steel beam system to support a cooling tower. Right now I'm on the column loads, more specifically the flexure design using the AISC equation H1-1b.

I know this was probably covered before (tried searching and did not find what I needed), I need to determine the moment at the top of the column (Mrx & Mry) without using software, where the beam connects. This feels so basic, but cannot find what I need. I used a simple statics (Horizontal Wind Load P x Length) but the moment is too high so I need a more specific method. Can the Euler's formula be reworked to determine moment or deflection? Or rework the Moment diagrams on a beam (Table 3-23 AISC)?

The wind load was already calculated and I used the resultant divided by the tributary area of the worst case support.

Any help here is much appreciated. Thank you!
 
Sort by date Sort by votes
Simple statics usually don't lie. Force times the arm will be your moment. Obviously you need to take the appropriate force (depending on the tributary and number of columns participating in resisting the wind) and multiply it by the appropriate arm (wind resultant to the top of column(s)), but that's the right approach.
If you're willing to provide a sketch, we will have better picture of your problem and likely better answers.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Thank you. My traditional statics is very conservative, where since this is a framed member (see diagram below) the top is more rigid than the calc. I was very close, only off by about 10% of the value I needed. I ended up bumping up the HSS tube steel.

Capture1_my6cwr.jpg


Thanks!
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
If you have a braced frame as shown above, you should not have a moment at the top of the column
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
In the usual case where the member joints are assumed pinned, I agree with MotorCity. Are you considering your member joints to be fixed? If so, that's a pretty determinate thing and not easily estimated by hand other than say that the braces ought to be the stiffer load path by far.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Agreed with the above comments. Unless you provide a stiff enough connection between col and beam you will not get a fixed condition. And even if, your brace will be stiffer and will take more of the lateral load which will reduce the moment in your joint.
I would model it as pinned at corners and let all the lateral be taken by the bracing. Otherwise you may be under sizing the brace and its connections assuming the joint takes more load than it actually does.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Thank you all for the suggestions. Yes I took it as pinned.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Engineerataltitude
  • Question Question
pre-qualified beam-to-column corner connection "calculations" in structural steel OMF?
Replies
2
Views
4K
JoshPlumSE
JoshPlumSE
hdp321
  • Question Question
Moment Connection Reinforcement
Replies
7
Views
6K
KootK
KootK
J
  • Locked
  • Question Question
Modelling shear wall and steel columns
Replies
1
Views
2K
KootK
KootK
AndBre44
  • Locked
  • Question Question
Plywood Diaphragm Attachment to Steel Moment Frame
Replies
10
Views
2K
lexpatrie
lexpatrie
hemiv
  • Locked
  • Question Question
Combined Wood and Steel Moment Frame
Replies
1
Views
921
lexpatrie
lexpatrie

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top