×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Sheet pile wall analysis using NAVFAC 7.02

Sheet pile wall analysis using NAVFAC 7.02

Sheet pile wall analysis using NAVFAC 7.02

(OP)
Engineers,

I am working on the design of a sheet pile wall system. The guidelines I am using are the ones provided by NAFVAC DM 7.02.

In Figure 21 (pag 7.2-92), there is a solved example. Please refer to the file attached.

In the safety factor against Failure section (top right column), (taking moments about point A), I noticed that in the sum of moments of active forces, force Pa1 (=1.55 kips and arm of 0.73 ft, acting counterclockwise) is not acting in the same direction as the rest of the active forces (clockwise), but still, for this example it was considered as having the same sign convention as the other active forces acting about this point.

Does this approach by the DM make sense to you?

Another question, Fig 18 (pag 7.2-88) of the same manual, provides instructions of how to compute the embedment depth and the pull out force. In step 2, when computing moments about point a, in order to find the embedment depth, I noticed that the manual suggests to use PP/FS, similar to step 3, for computing the Pull out force. In the example presented in page 7.2-92, this approach is not followed.

PP/FS is only applied when computing anchor pull out force BUT is not applied when computing embedment force.

Please let me know your thoughts.

Thanks.

RE: Sheet pile wall analysis using NAVFAC 7.02

The NAVFAC example is a typical embedment depth problem using the Free Earth method. The Free Earth method calculates the embedment depth by summing moments around the lowest support. The Factor of Safety method used in the example is very old. Usually today for ASD design the Passive Pressure is divided by 1.5, moments are summed to zero around Point A, then the support force can be calculated by summing the forces in the x direction. The reported embedment depth is the depth calculated above multiplied by 1.2.
For a great example see the NY DOT GDP-11 Revision 4 document dated Aug 2015, Pg E-3 "EXAMPLE-ANCHORED SHEETING WALL". I have attached the document.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - Integrating the Engineering Ecosystem
Aras Innovator provides multiple options for integrating data between systems, depending on the scenario. Utilizing the right approach to meet specific business requirements is vital. These needs range from authoring tools, federating data from various and dissimilar databases, and triggering processes and workflows. Download Now
Research Report - Simulation-Driven Design for SOLIDWORKS Users
In this engineering.com research report, we discuss the rising role of simulation and the paradigm shift commonly called the democratization of simulation. In particular, we focus on how SOLIDWORKS users can take advantage of simulation-driven design through two analysis tools: SOLIDWORKS Simulation and 3DEXPERIENCE WORKS. Download Now
White Paper - Industry 4.0 and the Future of Engineering Education
With industries becoming more automated, more tech-driven and more complex, engineers need to keep their skills and knowledge up to date in order to stay on top of this wave—and to be prepared for the Industry 4.0 future. The University of Cincinnati offers two online Master of Engineering degree programs designed specifically for practicing engineers. Download Now
eBook - The Design Gridlock Manifesto
In this eBook, you’ll learn 6 ways old CAD technology slows your company down and hear how design teams have put those problems to rest. “The Design Gridlock Manifesto” shares first-hand modern CAD experiences from 15 companies around the world. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close