×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Ravigneaux Gearset Ratio Analysis

Ravigneaux Gearset Ratio Analysis

Ravigneaux Gearset Ratio Analysis

(OP)
I am looking at design alternatives for a gearbox section that will need to offer one reduction ratio forward and one reverse. I know I can use a single planetary set to get the ratios (and directions) I need with a sun gear input, locking the carrier and using the ring for output (reverse) and locking the ring and outputting on the carrier (for forward), but this will require 4 clutches including 2 on the output shaft!  Not pretty from a control point of view.

Going to 2 simple planetaries is relatively easy, as I could simply shift from one sun to the other, but I would need to anchor the ring of one set and the carrier of the other to the case.  This leads me to think I could use a single ravigneaux set and just anchor the ring to the case, always outputting the carrier. One sun would drive through a second planet, giving me a reverse. Simple and maybe cheaper.

Question: When calculating ratios in a ravigneaux gearset, presuming the planets have an equal number of teeth, are ratios calculated exactly as they are with simple planetaries, that is 1 + ring/sun = ratio?   Any other references, hints and comments on the subtleties of ravigneaux geartrains would be appreciated.  

RE: Ravigneaux Gearset Ratio Analysis

(OP)
I'm sorry, even after reading through the post 3 times, I see I stated my design incorrectly.

For the ravigneaux set, I plan to output from the ring and anchor the carrier!  That is the way I have it drawn.

RE: Ravigneaux Gearset Ratio Analysis

Woohoo!  My fist forum post anywhere!

Sorry, to answer your question, the ratio of the ravigneaux would be just (ring/sun) and also negative (-ring/sun).

Hope that helps

RE: Ravigneaux Gearset Ratio Analysis

ops!  I think I mispoke about the negative...  what I meant was that one ratio is negative and one is positive

I think the ratios would be
  -(1+ring/sun1)
   ring/sun2

Also, the planets do not need to have the same number of teeth-- the ratios are still valid.

RE: Ravigneaux Gearset Ratio Analysis

Ops!  I assumed that one of the ratios would be (1+ring/sun) but that's only if you anchor the ring!  Sorry, it's been a while since I've thought about this stuff (that's why I have no references for you).

I guess I should be more thorough for accuracy-- that way I know I'm not making any more silly mistakes!

For a single planetary gear set:
if you hold the ring, ratio = (1+ring/sun1)
if you hold the carrier, ratio = -ring/sun1

For a planetary gear set with two sets of planets (sun meshes with one set, and ring meshes with the other).  Like a ravigneaux without one of the sun gears:
if you hold the ring, ratio = -(ring/sun2-1) = (1-ring/sun2)
if you hold the carrier, ratio = ring/sun2

So, the ratios you'd get are by anchoring the carrier and outputing the ring would be
-ring/sun1
ring/sun2
(where sun2 is the one that is connected the ring through two sets of planets.  Usually sun2 is smaller than sun1, but I don't think it has to be)

Sorry for the silly mistakes.  This time I've been thorough, so you can see where I made the little mistakes.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - Integrating the Engineering Ecosystem
Aras Innovator provides multiple options for integrating data between systems, depending on the scenario. Utilizing the right approach to meet specific business requirements is vital. These needs range from authoring tools, federating data from various and dissimilar databases, and triggering processes and workflows. Download Now
Research Report - Simulation-Driven Design for SOLIDWORKS Users
In this engineering.com research report, we discuss the rising role of simulation and the paradigm shift commonly called the democratization of simulation. In particular, we focus on how SOLIDWORKS users can take advantage of simulation-driven design through two analysis tools: SOLIDWORKS Simulation and 3DEXPERIENCE WORKS. Download Now
White Paper - Industry 4.0 and the Future of Engineering Education
With industries becoming more automated, more tech-driven and more complex, engineers need to keep their skills and knowledge up to date in order to stay on top of this wave—and to be prepared for the Industry 4.0 future. The University of Cincinnati offers two online Master of Engineering degree programs designed specifically for practicing engineers. Download Now
eBook - The Design Gridlock Manifesto
In this eBook, you’ll learn 6 ways old CAD technology slows your company down and hear how design teams have put those problems to rest. “The Design Gridlock Manifesto” shares first-hand modern CAD experiences from 15 companies around the world. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close