Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Dynamic Cone Penetrometer, 45º vs 60º and hammer pounds

Dynamic Cone Penetrometer, 45º vs 60º and hammer pounds

Dynamic Cone Penetrometer, 45º vs 60º and hammer pounds

HI Experts,

We have a DCP from Humboldt that has a 45º cone point and 15lb hammer.

All the other references I see is using a 60º cone point with a 17.6 lb hammer.

I am guessing the results will be different. There are a lot of correlation tables for the 60º cone DCP while for the 45º DCP from Humboldt, we only have 1 from ASTM STP 399.

Is there other reference that I can use for the 45º cone point and 15lb hammer?
By the way I need a DCP to UCS estimate correlation. I have a DCP to N value:

But I am not entirely sure if the N-value here can be used for correlation to UCS.

Can anyone help me?


RE: Dynamic Cone Penetrometer, 45º vs 60º and hammer pounds

What are you using the UCS for? foundation design ? Is your hand being forced that you have to use DCP data or is there alternatives available?

I dont really like using DCP, the only time we use it is for small residential housing jobs. With a bit of conservatism it is probably ok. But Short answer for me, i wouldnt use a correlation from DCP to N to UCS. Too many correlations IMO.

RE: Dynamic Cone Penetrometer, 45º vs 60º and hammer pounds

What you have is known as the Sowers Dynamic Cone Penetrometer. It is correlated to SPT. There are numerous references to this.

Here is a link to an article with other correlations ASCE

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


eBook - Rethink Your PLM
A lot has changed since the 90s. You don't surf the Web using dial-up anymore, so why are you still using a legacy PLM solution that's blocking your ability to innovate? To develop and launch products today, you need a flexible, cloud-based PLM, not a solution that's stuck in the past. Download Now
White Paper - Using Virtualization for IVI and AUTOSAR Consolidation on an ECU
Current approaches used to tackle the complexities of a vehicle’s electrical and electronics (E/E) architecture are both cost prohibitive and lacking in performance. Utilizing virtualization in automotive software architecture provides a better approach. This can be achieved by encapsulating different heterogeneous automotive platforms inside virtual machines running on the same hardware. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close