×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Margin of safety for separation, NASA-STD-5020

Margin of safety for separation, NASA-STD-5020

Margin of safety for separation, NASA-STD-5020

(OP)
Hi,
I am trying to figure out the margin of safety for joint separation that I can allow in my structure.
The structure is a school-book example of a bolt connecting two flanges.

The standard (page 38, equation 6-23):
Link

So far I've determined my minumum preload, FF (1.15) and FSsep (1.2).


What does PtL (limit tensile load) mean exactly? How is it calculated?


Thanks in advance,
S

RE: Margin of safety for separation, NASA-STD-5020

I only got 1/2 way through your attmt, but surprised I could see no discussion about prying loads; possibly assuming that if the joint faces are clamped then no moment, though it's better to show this with sums. This is important if you've got a typical tension fitting where the single bolt is offset from the far field loadpath (draw a FBD).

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Margin of safety for separation, NASA-STD-5020

(OP)
What you write seems likely. Still, I would like to know how close I can be to contact separation and say fulfils the acceptance criteria.

Right not I'm leaning toward just using another general load factor.

Separation load / 1.5 = allowed load

The NASA way would be preferable since I believe that the load factor 1.5 is too conservative.

RE: Margin of safety for separation, NASA-STD-5020

PL is the limit applied load ... the applied load from limit loadcases. They'd use ultimate load to size the joint, that is the 1.5 factor (ultimate FoS).

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Solutions Brief - Protecting and Rescuing On-Ground Personnel
Keeping our warfighters safe and delivering them a competitive advantage is a key goal of departments of defense around the world. It’s a goal shared by embedded computing manufacturers like Abaco: we never forget who we serve.This case study describes how a major international contractor integrated an Abaco single board computer at the heart of its CAS/CSAR solution. Download Now
Datasheet - Top Enhancements Creo 7.0
PTC's Creo 7.0 has breakthrough innovations in the areas of generative design, real-time simulation, multibody design, additive manufacturing, and more! With Creo 7.0, you will be able to design the most innovative products faster than ever before, keeping you on the cutting edge of product design and ahead of your competition. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close