×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

P91 preheat to 899F.
3

P91 preheat to 899F.

P91 preheat to 899F.

(OP)
We have a customer that has come back on our ASME P91 GTAW procedures that 400deg preheat is insufficient. They require us to maintain a MINIMUM preheat of 899F!!! No, that's not a typo.

Here's the real kicker....they ALSO require a MAX heat input of 1.2 kJ/mm.

Yes, I know it's impractical but they are adamant that we meet their requirements.

I am curious of the community's collective thought. We are a bit curious here and treating it like a brain-teaser...what would happen if we ACTUALLY tried to weld it with those req.


RE: P91 preheat to 899F.

Maybe they are confused on the different between C and F or how to convert C to F?

Or maybe they need a consultant's help in understanding the need for preheat.

Best regards - Al

RE: P91 preheat to 899F.

When the laughter stops, ask them......1. Is it correct? 2. Why is it needed? 3. What is the history of this requirement?

RE: P91 preheat to 899F.

Confusion. Point your customer back to a code or standard, say ASME B&PV Code, Section I or even B31.1 Power Piping. The minimum preheat is indeed 400 deg F. Perhaps they are confusing interpass temperature with preheat.

RE: P91 preheat to 899F.

A very confused or ignorant client. Agree with all the above comments. No max interpass temp.!!?? If one wanted to ruin a P91 weldment, this would be a great requirement.

RE: P91 preheat to 899F.

Hi Viper 3982,
Forget about C or F. The client is totally at loss and has ill-knowledge about grade 91 steel.
Some education from the vendors end might help to speed up the work without undue interference and hindrance.
Ask them to refer any EPRI Grade-91 document or API-TR-938B as a good educative document on grade 91 steel.
That's my advice.
Thanks

Pradip Goswami,P.Eng.IWE
Welding & Metallurgical Specialist
Ontario,Canada.
ca.linkedin.com/pub/pradip-goswami/5/985/299

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close