Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Related Articles


a105 instead of a694

a105 instead of a694

a105 instead of a694

hi....i have one question of piping material....can i use material astm a105 insted of a694?

RE: a105 instead of a694

Probably going to depend on your Code of Construction (if any) and perhaps contractural requirements (if any).



The problem with sloppy work is that the supply FAR EXCEEDS the demand

RE: a105 instead of a694

code of construction in the compressor station is asme b 31.8

RE: a105 instead of a694

No, but A 106 can be used. A 105 is a specification for forged piping components and not piping itself;

Scope: This specification covers forged carbon steel piping
components for ambient- and higher-temperature service
in pressure systems. Included are flanges, fittings, valves,
and similar parts ordered either to dimensions specified by
the purchaser or to dimensional standards such as the MSS,

RE: a105 instead of a694


Just to clarify, are you asking about the material for the pipe itself, or the forged fittings?

A105 & A694 are both forging material. A105 is CS forgings, A694 is carbon and alloy steel forgings.
A106 is for seamless CS pipe.

Either way, you'll have to check the code to see what is allowed. Is this question just out of curiosity or is there a reason you're trying to replace A694 with A105?

"Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn."

- Benjamin Franklin

RE: a105 instead of a694

Yes you can use A-1 in pipeline construction per B31.8. Whether it is acceptable for use on production pipe (like API 5LX-XX) is another story - may be, may be not.

RE: a105 instead of a694

I believe that you are talking about flanges, low carbon steel, both standards, A105 and A694, are very different in the chemical and mechanical requirements,

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


White Paper: Rapid Manufacturing with FDM
The automotive industry is increasingly turning to additive manufacturing, and fused deposition modeling (FDM) specifically, as a reliable alternative to traditional metal-cutting methods, like milling, turning and boring. Download Now
White Paper: Revolution in Design
Open up new possibilities for your business by changing the way you think about product development. Compared to traditional methods, 3D printing offers advantages that allow you to make more innovative products and get them to market faster. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close