Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Engineered Fill Compaction Testing Frequency

Engineered Fill Compaction Testing Frequency

Engineered Fill Compaction Testing Frequency


I have typically seen compaction testing required every 2,500 sq. ft for structural fill. Is there any published guidelines for specifying testing frequency?

RE: Engineered Fill Compaction Testing Frequency

1 test per 2500 square feet is referenced in the Florida Building Code and perhaps others, since it is based on the IBC. That is reasonable; however, additional specifications should be provided such as one density test per 50 linear feet of footing, and a minimum of 3 tests in any area per lift.

RE: Engineered Fill Compaction Testing Frequency

This is from Day's Foundation Engineering Handbook but is based on NAVFAC DM-7.2. It is based on volume rather than area. In order to get the frequency per area, I consider the lift thickness which will result in less frequency than Ron's input. However, Ron's input is reasonable to me and also supported by the IBC.

RE: Engineered Fill Compaction Testing Frequency

it really depends on what you are constructing and who is paying for it. for highways, dams, levees, or other heavy construction, all may be different than recommended above (Okiryu's reference touches on this). additional/minimum testing is required per day, per shift, per lift, per material change, when high or low values of density or MC pop up, or as the engineer sees fit, etc.

typical highway QA testing requirements

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


eBook - Rethink Your PLM
A lot has changed since the 90s. You don't surf the Web using dial-up anymore, so why are you still using a legacy PLM solution that's blocking your ability to innovate? To develop and launch products today, you need a flexible, cloud-based PLM, not a solution that's stuck in the past. Download Now
White Paper - Using Virtualization for IVI and AUTOSAR Consolidation on an ECU
Current approaches used to tackle the complexities of a vehicle’s electrical and electronics (E/E) architecture are both cost prohibitive and lacking in performance. Utilizing virtualization in automotive software architecture provides a better approach. This can be achieved by encapsulating different heterogeneous automotive platforms inside virtual machines running on the same hardware. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close