×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

rural facultative pond capacity

rural facultative pond capacity

rural facultative pond capacity

(OP)
I have to rate the capacity of a rural facultative pond (2 cells in parallel)to see if it can sustain the projected pop'n growth over the next 10yrs.
Known:pond vol.,Qinf & water quality in (both from metered force main),water quality out, source of hauler waste (res. septic&holding tanks)
Estimated:Qeff, vol. of septage contributed by haulers, det. time (they're discharged twice a yr)
Assumed: d=0.5, k(20deg)=0.25, theta=1.06
Unknown:liquid temps, quality of hauler waste
Originally I planned to back out seasonal k values given that I knew BOD in and out for existing conditions, and then proceed with the projected flows to see what vol. of pond I would need for the same performance (BOD removal).  But, then I realized I couldn't account for the hauler waste BOD - so I don't really have So/S.  
Are the above noted assumptions reasonable and would it be practical to assume hauler waste BOD (from Metcalf&Eddy)and perhaps even rate constants knowing typical ambient air temps? (especially given that even Qeff is an estimate)
Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

RE: rural facultative pond capacity

Sounds like you are on the right course to me.  Regarding the temperature input, remember it is for BOD5 reduction which decreases with decreasing temperature, so winter removal efficency controls the effluent quality.  

I would be comfortable using literature values for the hauled waste only if it is predominatly residential.  If it is industrial and commercial, you shuld do some testing.  There is lots of high strength and toxic waste out there.

RE: rural facultative pond capacity

Determining BOD on hauled waste is a bearcat.  I've had residential hauling from systems that "shocked" my treatment facility, particularly in winter.  The remedy was to introduce starter enzyme (acti-zyme) bacteria to get the system functioning normally again.  Haulers should be septage haulers only, and not crossovers with other industries (such as oil patch or industrial).  If they serve other clients, then verification has to be submitted that the tank was flushed properly before picking up septage.  Again, I had an oil hauler sneak a septage load without first flushing his tank.  THe result was a nasty cleanup bill for removal of the oil plus loss of his license to dump.  He was also turfed as an oil hauler due to the Provincial regulators getting on the oil company's case.  Be careful.

KRS Services
www.krs-services.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close