Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Structural Ridge Splice

Structural Ridge Splice

Structural Ridge Splice

Have read a few different threads that I think are close to answering my question, but don't quite come to resolution.

Question is about splicing a wood ridge beam where a center support was removed by GC. Sketch attached for clarity/reference.

We have two 4x14 structural ridge beams that met at a post in the middle of the home. Each beam is about 11' long. Contractor removed the post and simply applied splice plates to each side with six bolts each end. This splice is at midspan.

If the beam were continuous, there is no way it can handle the load. Enercalc shows 250% over stress even with best case scenarios.

I don't think the calculation would work the same as if the beam were continuous so perhaps I don't have to worry about the previous statement (or do I?), but the splice must dump some moment into the end of the beam while resolving the T/C forces generated by the "overall moment at midpan"...looking for guidance.

1. I'd like to know if anyone can point me to somewhere, or give advice, on how this calc should be performed.
2. Does anyone have thoughts on whether this "looks good" or "sounds about right", or "no, definitely not right or safe!"?
3. Does this even make sense? If a continuous beam couldn't have held the load, should we be attempting this splice?

Side note: the ridge beam actually measures 3.5" x 12.75"...anyone have insight here? Weird size.

RE: Structural Ridge Splice


Even a properly constructed splice only makes the beam act as if it's continuous. Therefore 250% stress.

Upgrades are required, or replacing the support.

RE: Structural Ridge Splice

That's what I initially thought and told the customer, but still second guessed myself...

Perhaps we can get a few more people to weigh too?

RE: Structural Ridge Splice

Very bad.

I agree with jayrod here.

The 4X14 is too small to make that span work, even if there was a splice in place that would work.


1. New ridge beam,
2. add a transverse beam with a king post at the removed column location, or
3. reinstall post.

Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)

RE: Structural Ridge Splice

Thanks for the confirmation Mike.

RE: Structural Ridge Splice

I assume that this is a structural ridge based on the size. As in no ceiling joists or suitable collar ties. What had been supporting the post?

RE: Structural Ridge Splice

It is - no CJ or ties anywhere. There was a stud pack (from pictures) of about 5 2x4's where the two terminated at midspan.

RE: Structural Ridge Splice

I agree with your assessment if you are looking at this as a pure beam supporting rafters. If you look at the two sloped roofs as plywood beams spanning end to end and leaning on each other at the ridge beam then the splice may work since it is really acting as a tension member and not a true beam. For new construction I would never analyze it in such a manor, but when I am in 100 year old houses and barns that have been loaded in every combination over the years and are still standing, I think you owe it to the owner to explore all avenues. The stud pack may have originally been an erection aid that was not needed once complete and acting as a single designed unit. Just my thoughts.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close