×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

MSS-SP 72 vs. B16.34
2

MSS-SP 72 vs. B16.34

MSS-SP 72 vs. B16.34

(OP)
Not sure why the customer wants the valve to be per MSS-SP-72 rather than B16.34 ?
would anybody know what could be the reason?

RE: MSS-SP 72 vs. B16.34

2

Given your general question, then I can only imagine general multiple-choice answer
a. MSS-SP-72 define port sizes for ball valve smaller than 24” for both full bore and reduce bore. I believe this is not covered by ASME 16.34 solely. Thus, customer maybe requires an exact Cv or pressure drop requirement as like to like replacement
b. “Customer always right” mindset
c. This is replacement of existing old valve>designed/selected as per MSS-SP-72 > thus replacement with other standard requires Management of Change (MOC)> thus not desirable by customer
d. Critical safety related valve, thus any changes will involve government official approval>thus not desirable by customer
e. Customer do not have the capability to assess the gap between MSS-SP-72 and ASME 16.34. this is quite common if the purchase order driven by procurement without engineering consultancy
f. etc.

Sometimes the practical solution is for the PO awardee to assess the gap of their existing stock valve (let say as per ASME 16.34) and issue a declaration of conformity that it is also adhering MSS-SP-72

Kind regards,
MR

https://nosuchvalve.com
All valves will last for years, except the ones that were poorly manufactured; are still wrongly operated and or were wrongly selected

http://www.eng-tips.com/faqs.cfm?&rat1=2&f...

RE: MSS-SP 72 vs. B16.34

(OP)
i did go through every section of the MSS-SP-72 from section 1: scope till section 7: testing, and compared to 6D.
i found that 6D is equal or better than MSS-SP-72. so basically if the valve is meeting 6D then it meets MSS-SP-72

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close