Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Los Angeles test machine

Los Angeles test machine

Los Angeles test machine

Resistance to fragmentation with Los Angeles machine : is there any standard specifying min acceptable values for different jobs (i.e., stock yards for light or heavy weight, urban roads, highway, etc) ?

Thanks for help

RE: Los Angeles test machine

Yes. You are referring to the L.A. Abrasion test and most departments of transportation have acceptance criteria for loss on abrasion by this method.

Go to ASTM and search L.A. Abrasion and you'll get numerous references to various standards that give acceptance criteria.

RE: Los Angeles test machine

ASTM C131/C131M (2014) Standard Test Method for Resistance to Degradation of Small-Size Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles Machine

Also, we have this language in our pavement's subbase/base course specs:

Material retained on the 4.75 mm sieve shall have a percentage of wear not to
exceed 50 percent after 500 revolutions when tested as specified in
ASTM C131/C131M. At least 50 percent by weight retained on each sieve
shall have one freshly fractured face with the area at least equal to 75
percent of the smallest midsectional area of the piece. Aggregate shall
be reasonably uniform in density and quality.

See this link for the test method: http://www.pavementinteractive.org/los-angeles-abr...

RE: Los Angeles test machine

Many are now going to the micro-deval abrasion test. It is preferred to the hydro engineers of whom I know as the most appropriate for concrete aggregates.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close