×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Optimum Water Content for Sand With Minimal Fines

Optimum Water Content for Sand With Minimal Fines

Optimum Water Content for Sand With Minimal Fines

(OP)
Hello,

I'm currently at a mining project involving re-construction of dikes for their tailings area. The material being used is a sandy soil with approx. 10% fines. Compaction testing is required for these areas, and I'm questioning the results I'm getting for my proctor.

For my optimum water content, I keep getting approx. 14.0% optimum. I have done multiple proctors on the same material, and keep getting consistent results with respect to the optimum. My cross-shift, however, has performed a couple proctors on the same material and it resulted in approx. 6.5% optimum. The material does change slightly throughout the site, but it should not be that much different. Also, there have been additional proctors on material with more aggregate present, and they have resulted in a higher optimum than 6.5%. This might indicate that 6.5% could also be too low. I know sometimes with cohesionless soils, if they are too dry, the densities can rise and fall giving a false indication that optimum has been achieved. In my experience, I have never done a sand proctor without aggregate, and achieved an optimum around 6.0%.

We are both using the same ASTM methods, and my proctors don't start to "bleed" until approx. 15.0%, indicating it's just past optimum. I am not re-using any material from previous points either.

Does anybody have any suggestions as to why we keep resulting in such different optimums? I should also note, our maximum densities are pretty much identical in comparison.

RE: Optimum Water Content for Sand With Minimal Fines

Provide a few curves by each. My bet is the sand is very uniform in gradations, little range of sizes, similar to a bunch of marbles.

RE: Optimum Water Content for Sand With Minimal Fines

Were these standard or modified Proctors?

14% for standard Proctor would not be particularly unusual. It's a bit high for modified.

Also....your specific gravities are all over the place! Typically sand specific gravities don't vary as much as you have shown. With the lower optimum moisture content the curves can't be compared to the ZAV curve.

Check your specific gravity assumptions.

RE: Optimum Water Content for Sand With Minimal Fines

(OP)
Proctor was a standard effort.

Another reason I thought 6.7% was somewhat low for the optimum was because the specific gravity seems too low to be close to the ZAV curve. The S.G. would have to be approx. 2.1 for the wet points to be close to the ZAV curve, and that's too low in my opinion.

The material does have iron ore present in it, and it changes with location. That's why the S.G. range from 2.55 - 2.65, even though they are assumptions.

RE: Optimum Water Content for Sand With Minimal Fines

Assuming the iron ore is hematite, your specific gravity assumptions are still low at 2.55-2.65.
Most natural sands will be between 2.6 and 2.7
Hematite has a specific gravity of about 5, so it doesn't take much of it to run your specific gravity way up.

Get the SG right so you can check saturation and get the ZAV curves right. I suspect your curve algorithm is also using the SG which is throwing your curves off.

Plot your curves manually as a check

RE: Optimum Water Content for Sand With Minimal Fines

The one-point is your friend!

Take three of the laboratory proctors and trace them all on one piece of paper. Go in the field with a concrete block, mold and hammer. Take the sand fill, get it below optimum and run a one-point. Walk that one-point onto your traced, "Family of curves" (after all it's a family of curves for your site) and see which curve the new one-point most relates to.

f-d

ípapß gordo ainÆt no madre flaca!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close