Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Code guideline for using FEM

Code guideline for using FEM

Code guideline for using FEM

In Eurocode 3 – Design of steel structures – Part 1-5: Plated structural elements; Annex C [informative] – Finite Element Methods of analysis (FEM), very useful guidelines are given for FEM analysis. Does anyone know if the American steel design codes offer something similar?

RE: Code guideline for using FEM

Not in the actual language of the code that I'm aware of. I know ACI has a few technical publications that touch on FEM in concrete that could perhaps be considered best practice. I'm not aware of anything by AISC.

RE: Code guideline for using FEM

Thanks for your response to my question. Do you know the exact name or number of the ACI technical publications that provide information about concrete FEM?

RE: Code guideline for using FEM

446.3R-97: Finite Element Analysis of Fracture in Concrete Structures Link
SP-205: Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures Link
SP-237: Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures Link

Would note that the last two are collections of papers rather than a consolidated document. If you're looking for something similar to Annex C of EC3, then I'm not sure you'll find it in US codes. Using EC3 annex as a guide is probably a good start though.

The ACI committee for this is 447. Supposedly they're developing a bunch of different documents, but I haven't seen anything come out yet. Committee 447 - Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures

AISC response to FEA-related question in the past:
Does the AISC Specification define acceptance criteria for steel when using finite-element modeling to assess the stress distribution?

No. Assessment of results employing finite-element modeling techniques is really a matter of engineering judgment. The AISC Specification limit states are based on use of average stresses in most cases; not peak stresses as may result from a finite element analysis. When such is used, engineering judgment is involved as to how this may relate to the Specification parameters, and is beyond the scope of the Specification. Localized stresses in members are assumed to redistribute through inelastic deformation thus justifying the use of average values. Where such localized stresses can be cause for failure, such as at net sections, the Specification accounts for them separately. Please note that AISC typically deals in member strength values that correspond to the entire member cross-section, while finite element programs are likely to give stress values that vary across the member cross-section.

July 2010 Steel Interchange

RE: Code guideline for using FEM

Thank you very much for your help and detailed response!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


eBook - Integrating the Engineering Ecosystem
Aras Innovator provides multiple options for integrating data between systems, depending on the scenario. Utilizing the right approach to meet specific business requirements is vital. These needs range from authoring tools, federating data from various and dissimilar databases, and triggering processes and workflows. Download Now
White Paper - Industry 4.0 and the Future of Engineering Education
With industries becoming more automated, more tech-driven and more complex, engineers need to keep their skills and knowledge up to date in order to stay on top of this wave—and to be prepared for the Industry 4.0 future. The University of Cincinnati offers two online Master of Engineering degree programs designed specifically for practicing engineers. Download Now
White Paper - Comparing Multi-Patterning at 5nm: SADP, SAQP, and SALELE
Self-aligned multi-patterning techniques such as SADP, SAQP, and SALELE are increasingly popular at advanced nodes, but each process has its pros and cons. IMEC and Mentor, a Siemens business collaborated to identify potentially less-obvious process and design limitations and trade-offs between the three SAMP techniques. Learn more in this paper. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close