×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Correlation between SPT and Clay Properties
2

Correlation between SPT and Clay Properties

Correlation between SPT and Clay Properties

(OP)
Hi

Anyone has the Stroud (1974) and Stroud and Butler (1975) papers on the correlation between SPT and undrained shear strength and volume of compressibility?

Stroud (1974) The standard penetration test in insensitive clays and soft rocks
Stroud and Butler (1975) The standard penetration test and the engineering properties of glacial materials

Any idea how reliable are these correlations? Any other correlations that you normally use in your design? I am trying to estimate the pile group settlement and ultimate capacity. All I have right now is the SPT-N data.

Thanks.

RE: Correlation between SPT and Clay Properties

Jjsim,

See attached technical note which questions the use of SPTs in clays.

Although it raises questions, correlation of N values to undrained shear strength is widely used in the UK. I have even seen engineers use N values to determine undrained shear strength over shear vanes that directly measure undrained shear strength in the same borehole....

RE: Correlation between SPT and Clay Properties

EireChch, I share your frustration with the continued use of SPTs in industry. It seems to be one of those 'we've always done it this way' issues; older (senior) engineers teaching younger (junior) engineers to specify SPT tests, and so the cycle continues.

Anyone who has been following developments in site investigation techniques over the last 30 or so years knows that there are more reliable in situ tests than the SPT; the SPT is arguably the least reliable in situ test. Cost is obviously an important factor, but once you take into account the time taken to do a load of SPTs, other techniques (e.g. CPTs) are actually quite cost effective. If the cost of unreliable data on a design is also considered (e.g. in terms of additional conservatisms needed in the design due to the reduced reliability of the input data), then SPTs just aren't cost effective.

RE: Correlation between SPT and Clay Properties

jamming a pocket penetrometer into the SPT is more reliable then relying on the N-values. The pocket penetrometer should not be used in design, however. Just have to jam tubes and run lab tests - or use a CPT/DMT.

I go both ways.

f-d

ípapß gordo ainÆt no madre flaca!

RE: Correlation between SPT and Clay Properties

Eirechch:

Can you attach the file?

thanks, Dik

RE: Correlation between SPT and Clay Properties

I always seem to have trouble uploading files. Attached now Dik.

LRJ - Yes I would have to agree with you. A colleague of mine once told me that those were the most expensive words in business "we've always done it that way". SPTs have do have an advantage of being able to penetrate most soils. We use to have problems with CPTs when we had shallow gravel layers, i think they would call refusal as soon as they hit a qc of 30MPa . When you have to start pre drilling the cost goes up. Doing SPTs every 1.5m was the norm too where i worked. I asked one day for SPTs every 1m and the driller looked at me in shock. Again, "they had always done SPTs every 1.5m"

f-d - We regularly used N values for detail design. Although it was residential house foundations so consequences were not high risk.

RE: Correlation between SPT and Clay Properties

Thanks very much... Dik

RE: Correlation between SPT and Clay Properties

What's wrong about running some unconfined compressive strength tests on split spoon samples? I'd much rather use that than any N values for clay.

RE: Correlation between SPT and Clay Properties

A UCS test on a disturbed clay sample? The sample disturbance on clay would make the test non-representative of the intact condition, but so would the UCS test since soil is affected by radial confinement; that's what distinguishes it from rock. It might produce a conservative result, but again it would not be reliable.

RE: Correlation between SPT and Clay Properties

LRJ gosh what a shock. In over 50 years of examining and testing all kinds of soil samples and comparing quick sample tests to the least disturbed other samples from same site on thousands of jobs it's too late to change. Also budgets sometimes control how fancy you can be and also the degree of risk involved. Never been sued related to recommendations in reports. Many happy clients.

RE: Correlation between SPT and Clay Properties

You can see from the one chart that a given N value cuts across a huge range... consistent with everyone's comment about an N value being nearly useless...

Dik

RE: Correlation between SPT and Clay Properties

Hi Eirechch, Thanks for the link to the Reid and Taylor paper. I've saved it for my virtual library!

UCS on an SPT? Sure, that'll return some index value, that may be useful in correlation? I liken that to a more difficult process then using a pocket penetrometer. You also get unit charges for an UCS, which you would not get if the drilling geologist logged the holes with a pocket penetrometer in hand.

I don't have any context on residential geotechnical engineering - well other than aftermath lawsuits. . .

f-d

ípapß gordo ainÆt no madre flaca!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close