Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Strength +/-45 vs 0/90

Strength +/-45 vs 0/90

Strength +/-45 vs 0/90

Hi there,

Last week I took a course about composites materials. They showed us two carbon fiber strips but from the same plate. One was cut at 0/90º and the other at +/-45º. Same thickness.

So the 0/90º was stiffer (to bend) than the +/-45.

I don't understand why. The 0/90 has only one direction of fibers working (along the main axis). The +/-45 has both directions of fibers helping (ca 40% better, square root of 2). I don't get it.

Is it because the fibers are ending on the lateral edges?

Why is 0/90 stiffer?


RE: Strength +/-45 vs 0/90

You have to transform the stiffness, not just the stress, like the attached. You will see the order of the terms for stiffness (4th order) is different that for just a stress (or strain) transformation (2nd order). By the way, strength is very different from stiffness.


RE: Strength +/-45 vs 0/90

I know the difference between strength and stiffness; I understand I have to look to the youngs module of the fibers. So when there are more fibers, more stiffness

Unfortunately I don't understand the matrix

My reasoning about the fiber direction is not right? where is the problem?


RE: Strength +/-45 vs 0/90

Do you mean aside from the 0/90 orientation putting fibers in direct tension, where they are very stiff while the 45 orientation puts them in bending, where they are not stiff? Stiffness is driven by the outer fibers so the layer contributionss can't be simply added.

RE: Strength +/-45 vs 0/90

A composite laminate is not just a material, it is a structure and you have to follow the load path to understand its behavior. In +/-45 laminates the load does not simply go down the length of the fiber from one end to the other. First, at a 45 degree angle there will be 1.42 times more fiber length in getting from one end to the other. This means more stretch, less stiffness. Second, load has to transfer from layer to layer by shear loading of the resin matrix. Resin is orders of magnitude less stiff than carbon fiber. Third, under load the fibers will scissor and change orientation, again only resisted by resin stiffness.

In a 0/90 laminate the resin carries very little load and its function is primarily to keep the fibers from buckling.

RE: Strength +/-45 vs 0/90

- In the post title, you say strength. But for your question, you ask about stiffness. Perhaps you made a mistake in your title, but I wanted to be clear about this distinction.

- The axial and bending stiffness of the laminate is simply (and directly) determined via classical laminate theory (CLT); there are no complex physical phenomena going on. For each ply, you must determine the stiffness properties in the transformed system (which is the matrix above). Any composite book will show you how this is done. The axial stiffness of the laminate is represented by the summation of each ply's stiffness contribution. The bending stiffness is represented by the stiffness of each ply and its area moment of inertia contribution (position within the ply). These are known as the [A] and [D] matrices (and [a], [d] matrices). The first point is that you can not just use the "square root of 2" approach since the order of the terms for a stiffness transformation is not 2nd order (it is 4th order). Again, look you will need to first understand the posted equation and how it is developed (for the primary contribution for the 45 ply, it is 0.707^4 = 0.25, not 0.707^2 = 0.5). The second point is that for bending you must also consider the inertia effect and the fact that neutral axis for the 0/90 is not at the midsurface (its closer to the center of the 0 ply) while the neutral axis for the 45/-45 is at the midsurface (so there is a bit more going on).

P.S. Because this is a stiffness problem (and not a strength problem), you do not need to consider any complex effects (interlaminar effects, etc.). You simply treat each ply as a rotated homogeneous orthotropic material (note that an off-axis ply has shear-extension coupling); fortunately, this has been shown to correlate well to experimental data. If you are discussing strength, then all bets are off; there is a more complex interaction between the plies that needs to be accounted for. But that is an entirely different topic; there have been several threads dedicated to that in the past.

RE: Strength +/-45 vs 0/90

I see it wasn't as easy as I thought
Thank you everybody for the answers, it is now clearer

PD: Indeed, I made a mistake with the tittle

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close