Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


perpendicularity question

perpendicularity question

perpendicularity question

hello - I was told today that I did not understand the use of perpendicularity - I have a piece that has 2 90 degree surfaces - the top surface is 10" long which is perpendicular to the front surface which is 36" long = the front surface is datum a the top surface is perpendicular to a within .001" - I was told that in this configuration that surface a could be out by at least .036" (.001"x36) - this does not seem right to me - I thought that surface b must lie between 2 planes within .001" perpendicular to surface a - I would think that if a straightness tolerance of say .001"per inch on datum a then that might apply - I just need to clarify it for myself - any help would be greatly appreciated - thank you

RE: perpendicularity question

Please provide a sketch.

Certified Sr. GD&T Professional

RE: perpendicularity question

hello again |& thank you -

RE: perpendicularity question

File cannot be opened. Try again with no special characters in file name.

Certified Sr. GD&T Professional

RE: perpendicularity question


As per ASME Y14.5, perpendicularity is a linear measurement, as you have described. Perhaps your co-worker thinks it is an angle.


RE: perpendicularity question


Your interpretation is correct. There is no ratio "multiplier" based on the length of the datum feature or the feature under control. See Figure 6-3 on page 100 in Y14,5-2009. Note too, when applied to a planar surface, there is implied flatness equal to the perpendicularity tolerance.

Certified Sr. GD&T Professional

RE: perpendicularity question

hello again & thank you very much - i was sure i was right but considering his position i have to make it wrong - if you understand my meaning - thank you again for the vote of confidence - have a great day

RE: perpendicularity question

Your welcome.

Certified Sr. GD&T Professional

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close