Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Lug Support Design

Lug Support Design

Lug Support Design

Hello Everyone,

I'm trying to calculate the maximum weight each lug on a pressure vessel can support and I'm a little confused about a variable in the equation I'm using. The equation is from the Pressure Vessel Handbook 10th ed.

The variable for H (Lever arm of load) is slightly confusing for me. My question is where is it measured from? (If the pressure vessel is/isn't stiffened with a wear plate)

I know that H extends from Q (The location of the bolt hole/Location of load) but I don't know where it ends. In the picture it looks like it extends into the middle of the shell thickness. I've also seen other lug support calculations where it only extends to the outside of the shell. Could you guys place help me clarify where the dimention for H starts and stops?

Thank you for your help,

RE: Lug Support Design

I have previously interpreted that dimension as the center of a line which connects the most extreme edges of where the lug attaches to the shell. This line may or may not pass through the shell, depending on the shell diameter and thickness.

Remember that the shell is round, so the distance between the plane which the mounting hole (or holes) lives in is not the same distance from the shell everywhere. The method above gives a conservative value.

RE: Lug Support Design

In the figure, it looks like it's the middle surface of the plate.
I think in the anchor chair design, it's taken as the outside of the plate.
Taking it as the middle surface makes sense to me, as a lot of the derivations for plate bending assume a "thin" plate, ie, zero thickness, so there's not a distinction made between a load applied at the inside surface or the outside surface.

RE: Lug Support Design

Looks like shell mean radius (probably corroded) for both sketches to me.



The problem with sloppy work is that the supply FAR EXCEEDS the demand

RE: Lug Support Design

It depends on whether you want to calculate the stress in the shell - the stresses in the weld or in the case of a stiffened case the stresses in the welds of the attachment to the wear plate.

RE: Lug Support Design

Understand how the darn thing works, and being able to draw your own correct/accurate/ truly representative FBD’s (free body diagrams) of how it works, is far more important than worrying about a 1 or 2% change in the length of a moment lever arm. You are talking about an ‘H’ of about 6, 8, 10", and then you are also talking about (t/2) being on the range of .125 or .1875" +/-, thus, [8.125/8 = 1.016]. Unless something in the text immediately around the figure you posted said otherwise, I would think that the middle of the shell pl. thk. is a reasonable line to work from. You haven’t shown the equations you are dealing with or enough of the text around the figure, on the subject matter, to know exactly what you are trying to calculate. Then, also realize that you really don’t know all the possible loads on the vessel within 1 or 2%, and you have load factors on the loads, you have reductions on the allowable stresses, etc. etc. Finally, as likely as not, the equations are some sort empirical equations based on years of good experience, but not intended to imply exact max. stress. Use some good engineering judgement, and realize that you rarely see a failure caused by a 1 or 2% error in stresses or moments used, but you see failures regularly caused by misunderstanding of how the detail works, or poor detailing, or poor workmanship, etc. The actual shell pl. thk. and/or loss of thk. comes into play when you are finally calculating the shell stresses due to the support lugs and their reactions on the shell pl. If you want to worry about something other than .125" of lever arm length, consider what happens if one of the support lugs is applied .125" high on the vessel shell, and then not properly shimmed on its support pedestal. All of a sudden ‘Q’ or ‘n’ change radically. Good clean detailing, without reentrant corners or stress raisers, understanding the load paths, and that they be clean and simple, and how concentrated loads are distributed into the shell pl., good clean weld details and welding without defects are far more important than a 1 or 2% change in stress, as best we know that.

RE: Lug Support Design

Clear is in Pressure Vessel Design Handbook, H. BEDNAR, second edit pag 156 fig 5.9 ( or first edit pag 146)


RE: Lug Support Design

In any case H is not an accurate measure the moment arm. The bolt holes are not same as the load point unless you are pulling the vessel up. Q would be at the edge of the thing the support is sitting on.

FEA is better tool and results are often much different.

RE: Lug Support Design

Thank you everyone whos posted. I took all of your comments into consideration. I ended up using jgKRI's measurement because its most conservative, but dhengr's comment was also very helpful.

Thank you all once again for your insight.

RE: Lug Support Design

Quote (KevinNZ)

In any case H is not an accurate measure the moment arm. The bolt holes are not same as the load point unless you are pulling the vessel up. Q would be at the edge of the thing the support is sitting on.

This is true, but it's also a pressure vessel application- which means that conservatism rules the day.

RE: Lug Support Design

Hi TylerM,

Can you share the calculation detail here? I would like to learn the method. Thanks.

RE: Lug Support Design


I used the "Pressure vessels handbook 10th Ed. by: Eugene F. Megyesy" and it walks you through a lug support calculation on page 109. The equations used are as follows (with the variables defined in the first picture of this thread):

Longitudinal Stress:
S_1=±QH/(DR^2 t) (C_1 K_1+6 (K_2 R)/(C_2 t)+D/2(1.17+B/A) *R^2/HA)

Circumferential Stress:
S_2=∓QH/(DR^2 t) (C_3 K_3+6 (K_4 R)/(C_4 t))

For longitudinal stress you need to make sure S_1 plus internal pressure stress (PR/2t) is less than the allowable stress of the shell material times your joint efficiency

For circumferential stress you need to make sure S_2 plus your internal pressure stress (PR/2t) is less than the allowable stress of your shell material time 1.5


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close